Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4] Make module loopback honor requested latency

2015-02-07 Thread Georg Chini
On 06.02.2015 11:02, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 06.02.2015 14:56, Georg Chini wrote: One more thing: There is a systematic error in the adjust_time I could not work around without introducing too much overhead. The latency snapshot varies widely in the execution time, I measured values

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4] Make module loopback honor requested latency

2015-02-07 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
06.02.2015 14:56, Georg Chini wrote: One more thing: There is a systematic error in the adjust_time I could not work around without introducing too much overhead. The latency snapshot varies widely in the execution time, I measured values between 50 us and more than 60 ms. So if the extreme

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Profile switching on headphone plugging

2015-02-07 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
08.02.2015 11:06, Raymond Yau wrote: Hrm, that is actually a good question. In theory, I would expect module-switch-on-port-available to switch profiles between 2.0 and 2.1 as headphones are plugged in and out, but in practice, - I'm not 100% sure if our don't switch to HDMI

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v4] Make module loopback honor requested latency

2015-02-07 Thread Georg Chini
On 07.02.2015 20:50, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 06.02.2015 14:56, Georg Chini wrote: One more thing: There is a systematic error in the adjust_time I could not work around without introducing too much overhead. The latency snapshot varies widely in the execution time, I measured values

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Profile switching on headphone plugging (was: LFE filter)

2015-02-07 Thread Raymond Yau
Hrm, that is actually a good question. In theory, I would expect module-switch-on-port-available to switch profiles between 2.0 and 2.1 as headphones are plugged in and out, but in practice, - I'm not 100% sure if our don't switch to HDMI might prevent switching from 2.1 to 2.0