[pulseaudio-discuss] json libraries

2016-11-03 Thread Peter Meerwald-Stadler
Hi, here is a comparison of JSON parsing libraries, http://seriot.ch/parsing_json.php maybe of interest since PA is now using its own code instead of json-c... regards, p. -- Peter Meerwald-Stadler +43-664-218 (mobile) ___ pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to >> plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I >> should try to get

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi, > > The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to > plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I > should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9. > > Currently, the freeze is

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 09:54 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 3 November 2016 at 09:30, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > Openssl 1.1.0 made all structs opaque, which caused a build failure in > > raop_client.c. The struct member assignments are now replaced with a > > call to

[pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi, The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9. Currently, the freeze is planned for february 5th, with a no-new-packages policy since january.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 3 November 2016 at 09:30, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > Openssl 1.1.0 made all structs opaque, which caused a build failure in > raop_client.c. The struct member assignments are now replaced with a > call to RSA_set0_key(). > > BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96726

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v2] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
Openssl 1.1.0 made all structs opaque, which caused a build failure in raop_client.c. The struct member assignments are now replaced with a call to RSA_set0_key(). BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96726 --- Changes in v2: * More verbose comment. * Implement RSA_set0_key()

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:56 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 2016-09-10 18:39 GMT+05:00 Tanu Kaskinen : > > > I have tested that this builds with old and new openssl, but I have not > > tested that the code works. I don't have any RAOP hardware. > > I think that you have an

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] raop: add compatibility with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 17:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 10 September 2016 at 10:39, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > +/* Openssl 1.1.0 broke compatibility. We could depend on openssl 1.1.0, but > > + * it may take some time before distributions are able to upgrade to the > > new > >