Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Crackling audio with Pulseaudio 4.0 and the simple Pulse API.

2013-07-11 Thread Ian Malone
On 11 July 2013 10:38, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 01:13 +0200, Peter Meerwald wrote: >> nevertheless, I think any type-(i) resampler could be relaxed (made more >> convenient for PA) by implementing a wrapper to add buffering and not >> pushing back samples to the remap buffer (

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: pa_database to adopt hdf5?

2013-06-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 25 June 2013 04:49, Jason Newton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Tanu Kaskinen > The data stored within HDF5 files is structured and the metadata makes > the files self-describing of their contents. This allows external > programs such as the HDF File viewer, matlab, and pytables to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] GSoC: Call for project ideas

2013-03-25 Thread Ian Malone
On 25 March 2013 06:13, David Henningsson wrote: > On 03/23/2013 12:11 PM, Toby Smithe wrote: >> becomes impractical, with drops and latency problems. A while ago, I >> looked into implementing Opus compression for the network streams, but >> never had a chance. I think Opus would make the ideal

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] GSoC: Call for project ideas

2013-03-25 Thread Ian Malone
On 23 March 2013 11:11, Toby Smithe wrote: > Hi, > > I have a fairly free summer coming up, and thought it would be nice to > participate in GSoC. For a while I've been interested in PulseAudio, and > I have an idea for a project. I wonder if you might say whether you > think it plausible. > > I u

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issue with NameLost

2013-02-03 Thread Ian Malone
On 31 January 2013 07:37, Ian Malone wrote: > On 31 January 2013 12:09, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:30 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote: >>> From: Mikel Astiz >>> >>> >>> Changes in v3: >>> - Patches should now apply cleanly

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix issue with NameLost

2013-01-31 Thread Ian Malone
On 31 January 2013 12:09, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 09:30 +0100, Mikel Astiz wrote: >> From: Mikel Astiz >> >> Patch 2/2 is solving an issue affecting Bluetooth (and probably other users) >> since commit 6be6766b58b3fa668a95563ac72ebe9970643cad. >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Patch

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] reserve-monitor: Don't trigger on our own events

2013-01-15 Thread Ian Malone
On 15 January 2013 07:41, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 01/13/2013 03:02 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 11 January 2013 14:57, David Henningsson >> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/11/2013 02:37 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2013-01-13 Thread Ian Malone
On 3 December 2012 04:07, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 12/02/2012 11:42 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> >> Thanks, I'm now able to reproduce the bug. I will try to find the root >> cause. >> > Thanks Tanu! Let me know what we can do to help. Fedora is a release behind > you guys for F18 (we will not be

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] reserve-monitor: Don't trigger on our own events

2013-01-13 Thread Ian Malone
On 11 January 2013 14:57, David Henningsson wrote: > On 01/11/2013 02:37 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: >> >> On 01/11/2013 02:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote: >>> >>> This fixes a bug where pulseaudio would give up the device (due to >>> a request from JACK), but then immediately grab it again because >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] reserve-monitor: Don't trigger on our own events

2013-01-11 Thread Ian Malone
On 11 January 2013 13:37, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 01/11/2013 02:04 PM, David Henningsson wrote: >> >> This fixes a bug where pulseaudio would give up the device (due to >> a request from JACK), but then immediately grab it again because >> the monitor callback fired, telling that the device is n

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-26 Thread Ian Malone
On 24 November 2012 13:01, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 03:04 -0500, Ian Malone wrote: >> On 20 November 2012 14:01, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 20:43 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 17:59 +, Ian Malo

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 24 November 2012 13:01, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > Note that you can add another "v" to get even more verbose output. I'm > not sure what I should look for in those logs. You said that "playback Neither am I, but then I'm not a developer for this project. > doesn't work" - is that a good or a b

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-21 Thread Ian Malone
On 20 November 2012 14:01, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 20:43 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 17:59 +0000, Ian Malone wrote: >> > Thanks, I'll give it a go. I think handling the already_owner case in >> > reserve.c as well mig

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-20 Thread Ian Malone
On 20 November 2012 17:37, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:45 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 21:45 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote: >> > I'm seeing this in virtual box under KDE (also Fedora 18 / pulseaudio 2.1). >> > >> > On my real desktop, if I configure qjackct

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-13 Thread Ian Malone
On 13 November 2012 19:20, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 12:21 -0500, Ian Malone wrote: >> It seems rd_acquire can get called while pulse still has the service >> name (how? don't know. I've tried a return 0 there, but the object >> path has already

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-11 Thread Ian Malone
On 10 November 2012 05:25, Ian Malone wrote: > On 9 November 2012 17:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:58 -0500, Ian Malone wrote: >>> method call sender=:1.110 -> >>> dest=org.freedesktop.ReserveDevice1.Audio1 serial=6 >>> path

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-10 Thread Ian Malone
On 9 November 2012 17:34, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:58 -0500, Ian Malone wrote: >> method call sender=:1.110 -> >> dest=org.freedesktop.ReserveDevice1.Audio1 serial=6 >> path=/org/freedesktop/ReserveDevice1/Audio1; >> interface=org.free

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-09 Thread Ian Malone
On 9 November 2012 13:59, David Henningsson wrote: > On 11/09/2012 12:15 PM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 7 November 2012 08:31, Ian Malone wrote: >>> >>> On 7 November 2012 06:46, David Henningsson >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/0

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-09 Thread Ian Malone
On 7 November 2012 08:31, Ian Malone wrote: > On 7 November 2012 06:46, David Henningsson > wrote: >> On 11/07/2012 12:52 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >>> >>> On 6 November 2012 15:58, Ian Malone wrote: >>>> I'll speculate that something somewhere is c

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-07 Thread Ian Malone
On 7 November 2012 06:46, David Henningsson wrote: > On 11/07/2012 12:52 AM, Ian Malone wrote: >> >> On 6 November 2012 15:58, Ian Malone wrote: >> etc. >> >> >>> >>> I'll speculate that something somewhere is confused by the presence o

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Malone
On 6 November 2012 15:58, Ian Malone wrote: etc. > > I'll speculate that something somewhere is confused by the presence of > two devices and either Audio1 isn't being provided correctly by pulse > (though it does create it) or requested properly by Jack (though with >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Malone
On 6 November 2012 11:47, Ian Malone wrote: > On 5 November 2012 12:49, Ian Malone wrote: >> On 4 November 2012 11:23, Ian Malone wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get a Jack DBUS setup working on Fedora 18. It seems >>> pulse refuses to re

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-06 Thread Ian Malone
On 5 November 2012 12:49, Ian Malone wrote: > On 4 November 2012 11:23, Ian Malone wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to get a Jack DBUS setup working on Fedora 18. It seems >> pulse refuses to release the audio device when it gets a dbus request >> from jack

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-05 Thread Ian Malone
On 4 November 2012 11:23, Ian Malone wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get a Jack DBUS setup working on Fedora 18. It seems > pulse refuses to release the audio device when it gets a dbus request > from jack: > > Sat Nov 3 20:08:11 2012: Starting jack server... > S

[pulseaudio-discuss] jackdbus module, pulse fails to conform on device reservation API

2012-11-04 Thread Ian Malone
Hi, I'm trying to get a Jack DBUS setup working on Fedora 18. It seems pulse refuses to release the audio device when it gets a dbus request from jack: Sat Nov 3 20:08:11 2012: Starting jack server... Sat Nov 3 20:08:11 2012: JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 60 Sat Nov 3 20: