Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] simple: fix negative latency handling

2017-07-13 Thread Grzegorz Kołodziejczyk
Right, I've missed it. Br, Grzegorz 2017-07-12 17:12 GMT+02:00 Tanu Kaskinen : > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 09:57 +0200, Grzegorz Kołodziejczyk wrote: > > Hi Tanu, > > > > I think you weren't rebased on master upstream with this patch or I have > a > > git problem :) > > I can't find

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] simple: fix negative latency handling

2017-07-12 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 09:57 +0200, Grzegorz Kołodziejczyk wrote: > Hi Tanu, > > I think you weren't rebased on master upstream with this patch or I have a > git problem :) > I can't find this negation of pa_bytes_to_usec "extra = > -pa_bytes_to_usec(p->read_index,

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] simple: fix negative latency handling

2017-07-11 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
pa_usec_t is an unsigned type, but there were calculations that used it as if it were a signed type. If the latency is negative, pa_simple_get_latency() now reports 0. Added some comments too. --- This patch doesn't apply to the master branch, so if you want to apply the patch, use the next