---
src/pulsecore/sink.c | 58 ++
1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink.c b/src/pulsecore/sink.c
index a2642b4..53cab32 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/sink.c
+++ b/src/pulsecore/sink.c
@@ -2403,6 +2403,46 @@
Warning bikeshed ahead.
2011/9/29 Tanu Kaskinen :
> ---
> src/pulsecore/sink.c | 58
> ++
> 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/pulsecore/sink.c b/src/pulsecore/sink.c
> index a2642b4..53cab32 100644
> --- a/src
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 00:36 +0300, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
> Warning bikeshed ahead.
>
> 2011/9/29 Tanu Kaskinen :
> > ---
> > src/pulsecore/sink.c | 58
> > ++
> > 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/pulseco
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:32 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
[...]
> I'm not against making the comments wider. What width would you be happy
> with? 100? I propose that something like the following is added to the
> CodingStyle document so that there won't be any bikeshedding in the
> future regarding
'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 30/09/11 10:35 did gyre and gimble:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:32 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm not against making the comments wider. What width would you be happy
>> with? 100? I propose that something like the following is added to the
>> CodingSt
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:31 +0300, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 30/09/11 10:35 did gyre and gimble:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 12:32 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I'm not against making the comments wider. What width would you be happy
> >> with? 100? I pro
