Also fixed a bug in sample_format_more_precise for 32-bit integer sample
formats.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 32 ++--
src/pulsecore/resampler.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/resampler.c b/src/pulsecore/re
Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also corrected the working
sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account. Removed duplicate
condition checks from the deduction code.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 25 -
src/pulsecore/resampler.h | 4
Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also corrected the working
sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account. Removed duplicate
condition checks from the deduction code.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 23 ++-
src/pulsecore/resampler.h | 4
2
Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also updated the working
sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 30 ++
src/pulsecore/resampler.h | 4
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -
Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also updated the working
sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account. The initial
libsoxr backend version does not variable rate resampling, so it is disabled in
this case.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 33 +
> Also fixed a bug in sample_format_more_precise for 32-bit integer sample
> formats.
can you please split out the bug fix as a separate patch?
it can be readily applied
thanks, p.
> ---
> src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 32 ++--
> src/pulsecore/resampler.h | 5 +
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Peter Meerwald wrote:
>
>> Also fixed a bug in sample_format_more_precise for 32-bit integer sample
>> formats.
>
> can you please split out the bug fix as a separate patch?
> it can be readily applied
Ok, will do.
___
On 2015-01-07 15:08, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also corrected the working
sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account. Removed duplicate
condition checks from the deduction code.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 23 ++
On Wednesday 07 January 2015 15:41:14 David Henningsson wrote:
> On 2015-01-07 15:08, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also corrected the
> > working sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account.
> > Removed duplicate condition checks from
Hello,
> On Wednesday 07 January 2015 15:41:14 David Henningsson wrote:
> > On 2015-01-07 15:08, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > > Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also corrected the
> > > working sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account.
> > > Removed duplicate cond
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Peter Meerwald wrote:
>> > >
>> > > case PA_RESAMPLER_PEAKS:
>> > > -if (a == PA_SAMPLE_S16NE || b == PA_SAMPLE_S16NE)
>> > > -work_format = PA_SAMPLE_S16NE;
>> >
>> > Were the rows above removed on purpose? I suppose the behavi
> Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also updated the working
> sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account.
what to do with PA_RESAMPLER_VARIABLE_RATE?
resampler_soxr_update_rates() just recreates the context, I guess this
will lead to crackling sound (not teste
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Andrey Semashev wrote:
re-posting to list, hope that is OK
> On Monday 12 January 2015 17:36:19 you wrote:
> > > Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also updated the working
> > > sample rate deduction to take the new resampler into account.
> > what to d
On Tuesday 13 January 2015 17:32:55 you wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>
> re-posting to list, hope that is OK
>
> > On Monday 12 January 2015 17:36:19 you wrote:
> > > > Added ID and names for the resampler presets and also updated the
> > > > working
> > > > sa
14 matches
Mail list logo
