Dear Eero,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 09:42 +0300 schrieb eero.nurkk...@offcode.fi:
> Quoting Paul Menzel:
> >> #include
> >> +#include
> >
> > Is sorting headers in these blocks useful?
> I missed the point about sorting - would you rather want the signal.h
> on top of stdio.h maybe?
ye
Quoting Paul Menzel :
#include
+#include
Is sorting headers in these blocks useful?
Hi,
I missed the point about sorting - would you rather want the signal.h
on top of stdio.h maybe?
#include
It would be great if you could resend as [PATCH v2]. You could also make
the commit summar
Dear Eero,
thank you for you patch.
Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2012, 07:57 +0300 schrieb eero.nurkk...@offcode.fi:
> From: Eero Nurkkala
>
> Compilation with -DDEBUG_TIMING fails due to a missing header:
>
> modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c: In function 'check_left_to_play':
> modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c:
From: Eero Nurkkala
Compilation with -DDEBUG_TIMING fails due to a missing header:
modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c: In function 'check_left_to_play':
modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c:453:9: warning: implicit declaration of
function 'raise' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c:453:9: error