Hello,
> this patch series aims to save memory allocations and some system calls
> related to PA's client/server protocol implementation
I've pushed the cleanup patches indicated below so that the more important
changes become more prominent in the list
I intend to push the first 16 patch ('tag
05.11.2014 04:25, Peter Meerwald wrote:
this patch series aims to save memory allocations and some system calls
related to PA's client/server protocol implementation
Patches 49, 46, 41, 39, 35, 32, 24, 13, 12 are obviously correct. And I
don't feel like looking at non-obvious patches after tod
Hi,
> > > preliminary benchmarking on Intel i5-2400S, 64-bit, Linux 3.13:
> > >
> > > running 'paplay --latency-msec=10 stereo_48KHz.wav', output on internal
> > > soundcard (Intel HDA), measuring the maximum CPU% in top for the
> > > pulseaudio
> > > and paplay
> > >
> > > code flags
Hi,
> > preliminary benchmarking on Intel i5-2400S, 64-bit, Linux 3.13:
> >
> > running 'paplay --latency-msec=10 stereo_48KHz.wav', output on internal
> > soundcard (Intel HDA), measuring the maximum CPU% in top for the pulseaudio
> > and paplay
> >
> > code flags PA pa
On 2014-11-05 00:25, Peter Meerwald wrote:
preliminary benchmarking on Intel i5-2400S, 64-bit, Linux 3.13:
running 'paplay --latency-msec=10 stereo_48KHz.wav', output on internal
soundcard (Intel HDA), measuring the maximum CPU% in top for the pulseaudio
and paplay
code flags
preliminary benchmarking on Intel i5-2400S, 64-bit, Linux 3.13:
running 'paplay --latency-msec=10 stereo_48KHz.wav', output on internal
soundcard (Intel HDA), measuring the maximum CPU% in top for the pulseaudio
and paplay
code flags PA paplay
master 6d1fd4d1 -O2