On 13.03.2018 18:40, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
The previous code made the SET_STATE message fail if trigger() failed.
However, trigger() was called after pa_sink/source_process_msg(), which
meant that the main thread that sent the SET_STATE thought that resuming
failed, but nothing was undone in the
The previous code made the SET_STATE message fail if trigger() failed.
However, trigger() was called after pa_sink/source_process_msg(), which
meant that the main thread that sent the SET_STATE thought that resuming
failed, but nothing was undone in the IO thread, so in the IO thread
things seemed
