On 11 March 2015 at 19:32, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Arun,
As you requested, I'm reviving the per-stream flat volumes discussion.
Thanks for helping revive this!
My preference would still be to add a separate stream-local volume
control pointer to
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 17:08 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 11 March 2015 at 19:32, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
Hi Arun,
As you requested, I'm reviving the per-stream flat volumes discussion.
Thanks for helping revive this!
My preference would still be to add
Hi Arun,
As you requested, I'm reviving the per-stream flat volumes discussion.
My preference would still be to add a separate stream-local volume
control pointer to pa_sink_input_info, but assuming that you haven't
changed your mind, that idea doesn't seem feasible to get through.
You seemed
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 16:58 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 11 August 2014 20:31, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
I don't really agree on the API niceness argument, because in my
proposal there are just two uint32_t fields added (indexes of the
always-relative volume
On 6 August 2014 14:15, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:31 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
I guess we're in disagreement there. We can discuss this further,
either in a separate thread, or at GstConf (or both), but I would like
to get some more opinions
On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 19:32 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 6 August 2014 14:15, Tanu Kaskinen tanu.kaski...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:31 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
I guess we're in disagreement there. We can discuss this further,
either in a separate thread, or at
06.08.2014 14:45, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 13:31 +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
I guess we're in disagreement there. We can discuss this further,
either in a separate thread, or at GstConf (or both), but I would like
to get some more opinions on getting this patch in soon, since
Le 2014-08-06 11:45, Tanu Kaskinen a écrit :
3) Add a second volume control to streams, one which represents the
stream's own volume only, i.e. never flat volume. Applications that
want
to avoid flat volume can use that volume control instead of the
primary
volume control.
Looking beyond
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:45 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Le 2014-08-06 11:45, Tanu Kaskinen a écrit :
3) Add a second volume control to streams, one which represents the
stream's own volume only, i.e. never flat volume. Applications that
want
to avoid flat volume can use that volume
Le 2014-08-06 16:10, Tanu Kaskinen a écrit :
The answer to your question: no, the normal stream volume and the
relative volume are very tightly tied together (and when flat volumes
are not in use, they're exactly the same thing). You can't change one
without affecting the other, and both are
Hi folks,
Alexander's already brought up the issue of websites that can set the volume on
a stream programmatically, and either unwittingly or malicious set the system
volume to 100% when using flat-volumes, and while I've been against having to
deal with this on the PulseAudio side, I think we
06.08.2014 00:54, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hi folks,
Alexander's already brought up the issue of websites that can set the volume on
a stream programmatically, and either unwittingly or malicious set the system
volume to 100% when using flat-volumes, and while I've been against having to
deal with
On 6 August 2014 01:12, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
06.08.2014 00:54, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hi folks,
Alexander's already brought up the issue of websites that can set the
volume on
a stream programmatically, and either unwittingly or malicious set the
system
volume to
06.08.2014 06:31, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 6 August 2014 01:12, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the real problem that needs to be solved is not only that flat
volumes are inapplicable to the web, but also that PulseAudio doesn't
provide any API for intra-application
On 6 August 2014 09:09, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
06.08.2014 06:31, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 6 August 2014 01:12, Alexander E. Patrakov patra...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the real problem that needs to be solved is not only that
flat
volumes are inapplicable to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
