Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread David Henningsson
On 2014-11-20 13:55, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:58 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-11-20 08:40, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: Crossposting to Debian and upstream lis

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread Felipe Sateler
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:58 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: >> >> On 2014-11-20 08:40, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: >> > 20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: >> >> Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. >> >> >> >> Apparently Debian

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 11:58 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > On 2014-11-20 08:40, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > 20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: > >> Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. > >> > >> Apparently Debian has a patch that uses fixed point by default on armhf, > >> s

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
20.11.2014 15:58, David Henningsson wrote: On 2014-11-20 08:40, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. Apparently Debian has a patch that uses fixed point by default on armhf, so I'm just echoing Luke's question here

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread David Henningsson
On 2014-11-20 08:40, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. Apparently Debian has a patch that uses fixed point by default on armhf, so I'm just echoing Luke's question here: Has anybody performed any testing or bench

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-20 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Thu, 2014-11-20 at 08:35 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. > > Apparently Debian has a patch that uss16 speex-fixed-3 587738 604034 874023 > 421630 543090 es fixed point by default on armhf, > so I'm just echoing Luke's question here: Has anybody per

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-19 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
20.11.2014 12:35, David Henningsson wrote: Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. Apparently Debian has a patch that uses fixed point by default on armhf, so I'm just echoing Luke's question here: Has anybody performed any testing or benchmarks across armhf hardware, w r t fixed point vs flo

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Ubuntu-audio-dev] Preferred resampler method on armhf.

2014-11-19 Thread David Henningsson
Crossposting to Debian and upstream lists. Apparently Debian has a patch that uses fixed point by default on armhf, so I'm just echoing Luke's question here: Has anybody performed any testing or benchmarks across armhf hardware, w r t fixed point vs floating point resampling with speex and Pul