On 29.04.20 00:03, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 21:52:55 Georg Chini wrote:
On 28.04.20 21:06, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 20:50:33 Georg Chini wrote:
Personally I don't see a problem to remove the AG role support from
the ofono backend because nobody uses it.
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 21:52:55 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 28.04.20 21:06, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 April 2020 20:50:33 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > Personally I don't see a problem to remove the AG role support from
> > > the ofono backend because nobody uses it. What I proposed earlier
> >
On 28.04.20 21:06, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 20:50:33 Georg Chini wrote:
Personally I don't see a problem to remove the AG role support from
the ofono backend because nobody uses it. What I proposed earlier
- allow hsphfpd to disable the HFP HS role and keep a "legacy" ofono
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 20:50:33 Georg Chini wrote:
> Personally I don't see a problem to remove the AG role support from
> the ofono backend because nobody uses it. What I proposed earlier
> - allow hsphfpd to disable the HFP HS role and keep a "legacy" ofono
> backend for the HFP HS role -
On 28.04.20 19:08, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 19:25:12 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
It's not helpful to repeat that the ofono code needs massive changes as
a precondition to having a hsphfpd backend without specifying those
changes, because it sounds so unlikely to be true. Later in
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 19:25:12 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> It's not helpful to repeat that the ofono code needs massive changes as
> a precondition to having a hsphfpd backend without specifying those
> changes, because it sounds so unlikely to be true. Later in your mail
> you mentioned that the
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 16:12 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 April 2020 16:33:01 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 13:08 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 28 April 2020 13:57:42 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > > Just to chime in on the ofono removal issue: I'm also of the
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 16:33:01 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 13:08 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 April 2020 13:57:42 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > > Just to chime in on the ofono removal issue: I'm also of the opinion
> > > that removing ofono support is not an option.
>
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 13:08 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 April 2020 13:57:42 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > Just to chime in on the ofono removal issue: I'm also of the opinion
> > that removing ofono support is not an option.
>
> Well, in this case you have 3 choices:
>
> * Fix it
On Tuesday 28 April 2020 13:57:42 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> Just to chime in on the ofono removal issue: I'm also of the opinion
> that removing ofono support is not an option.
Well, in this case you have 3 choices:
* Fix it yourself or find somebody who will work on it and would maintain this
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 07:48 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
> On 27.04.20 22:22, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2020 22:18:38 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 27.04.20 22:12, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Monday 27 April 2020 22:06:29 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > > On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini
On 27.04.20 22:22, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2020 22:18:38 Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 22:12, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2020 22:06:29 Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21
On Monday 27 April 2020 22:18:38 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 27.04.20 22:12, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Monday 27 April 2020 22:06:29 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 22:12, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 27 April 2020 22:06:29 Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
ofono. ofono
On Monday 27 April 2020 22:06:29 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini wrote:
> > On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
> > > > ofono. ofono + PA currently
On Monday 27 April 2020 21:45:47 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
> > > ofono. ofono + PA currently is the only way you can use your mobile
> > > on
On 27.04.20 21:45, Georg Chini wrote:
On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
ofono. ofono + PA currently is the only way you can use your mobile
on Linux and we should not break
On 27.04.20 01:44, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
ofono. ofono + PA currently is the only way you can use your mobile
on Linux and we should not break this (unless the hsphfpd supplies
the same
On Tuesday 31 March 2020 09:36:21 Georg Chini wrote:
> One comment here: The hsphfpd should be able to co-exist with
> ofono. ofono + PA currently is the only way you can use your mobile
> on Linux and we should not break this (unless the hsphfpd supplies
> the same functionality). So - similar to
On Tuesday 17 March 2020 13:06:52 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 16 March 2020 18:19:47 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 14:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hello! One month passed and I have not answer which solution would
> > > pulseaudio choose for HSP and HFP support. Could you
On 17.03.20 13:06, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2020 18:19:47 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 14:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello! One month passed and I have not answer which solution would
pulseaudio choose for HSP and HFP support. Could you please really look
at my email
I dunno if this is a pulseaudio problem but it is a freedesktop problem as the
current solution doesn’t work well and is huge bloat.
Between Bluez and Pulseaudio HSP/HFP profiles probably should have the similar
adoption as A2dp.
Maybe with a2dp becoming more common on devices for bi-directional
On Monday 16 March 2020 18:19:47 Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 14:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello! One month passed and I have not answer which solution would
> > pulseaudio choose for HSP and HFP support. Could you please really look
> > at my email about state of HSP / HFP
On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 14:37 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello! One month passed and I have not answer which solution would
> pulseaudio choose for HSP and HFP support. Could you please really look
> at my email about state of HSP / HFP support?
>
> On Saturday 15 February 2020 22:33:10 Pali Rohár
Hello! One month passed and I have not answer which solution would
pulseaudio choose for HSP and HFP support. Could you please really look
at my email about state of HSP / HFP support?
On Saturday 15 February 2020 22:33:10 Pali Rohár wrote:
> If Linux desktop / laptop with pulseaudio want to
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 15:29:02 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 18.02.20 13:37, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > a headset useless. There must be ways to work around such broken
> > > implementations. Would those headsets then not also break with
> > > your hsphfpd if there is no application that handles the
On 18.02.20 13:37, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 13:13:35 Georg Chini wrote:
On 18.02.20 11:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 11:06:03 Georg Chini wrote:
On 18.02.20 10:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
On
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 13:13:35 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 18.02.20 11:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 February 2020 11:06:03 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 18.02.20 10:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > > > On
On 18.02.20 11:29, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 11:06:03 Georg Chini wrote:
On 18.02.20 10:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
On 15.02.20 22:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
More then two months ago I started discussion how to
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 11:06:03 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 18.02.20 10:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
> > > On 15.02.20 22:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > More then two months ago I started discussion how to
On 18.02.20 10:34, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
On 15.02.20 22:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
More then two months ago I started discussion how to handle currently
unsupported parts of Bluetooth HSP and HFP profiles on Linux via
pulseaudio.
Hello!
On Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:42:38 Georg Chini wrote:
> On 15.02.20 22:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > More then two months ago I started discussion how to handle currently
> > unsupported parts of Bluetooth HSP and HFP profiles on Linux via
> > pulseaudio.
> >
> > Main
On 15.02.20 22:33, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello!
More then two months ago I started discussion how to handle currently
unsupported parts of Bluetooth HSP and HFP profiles on Linux via
pulseaudio.
Main problems are:
1) These profiles are bound with telephony stack and without having half
of
Hello!
More then two months ago I started discussion how to handle currently
unsupported parts of Bluetooth HSP and HFP profiles on Linux via
pulseaudio.
Main problems are:
1) These profiles are bound with telephony stack and without having half
of telephony stack it is not possible to
34 matches
Mail list logo
