Dear PusleAudio developers,
I'd like to let you know that Google ChromeOS recently started a brand new
project called "ADHD", which from what I can tell aims to do the same thing
that PulseAudio already does, bypassing it in favor of interacting directly
with ALSA:
http://git.chromium.org/gitw
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:21 -0700, Vlad wrote:
> Dear PusleAudio developers,
>
> I'd like to let you know that Google ChromeOS recently started a brand new
> project called "ADHD", which from what I can tell aims to do the same thing
> that PulseAudio already does, bypassing it in favor of inter
Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit :
> Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than
> an audio server.
Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio server?
Does PulseAudio not implement audio policy?
Sure, PulseAudio ce
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:02 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit :
> > Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than
> > an audio server.
>
> Isn't audio policy daemon just a fancier name for (modern) audio
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:02 +0300, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> > Le mardi 27 septembre 2011 17:27:14 Arun Raghavan, vous avez écrit :
> > > Do you have any more details? Seems to be more of a policy daemon than
> > > an audio server.
> >
> >
> I am indeed the one doing the majority of the work on the ADHD system at
> present, and I can answer questions about it. As a bit of background,
> PulseAudio was attempted for a while before my time on the Chromium OS
> project. The results for some of the hardware we have were not very
> insp
Hi All,
Just for reference, Taylor is not subscribed to the list (or wasn't
yesterday anyway).
Taylor, if you are working on Linux Audio, I strongly recommend you
subscribe to this list, even if you are not using PA (which I'll write
to you about in a separate email).
In the mean time, please se
Hi Taylor,
[ I've CC'ed a couple other potentially interested parties ]
'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble:
> Hello folks,
>
> I am indeed the one doing the majority of the work on the ADHD system at
> present, and I can answer questions about it. As a bit of b
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:02 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Hi Taylor,
>
> [ I've CC'ed a couple other potentially interested parties ]
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I am indeed the one doing the majority of the work on the ADHD
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:02 +0300, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > We've also looked at UCM and decided that it wasn't
> > right for our purposes, at least in the present state.
>
> FWIF PA will also support UCM in the near-ish future.
>
> In either case, if you need UCM-like features, I'd strongly advi
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:02:49AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble:
> > Hello folks,
> > project. The results for some of the hardware we have were not very
> > inspiring -- at idle, I was told Pulse would take 30% of the CPU. So
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Mark Brown <
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:02:49AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble:
> > > Hello folks,
>
>
>
> > > Since we have decided not to use Pu
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:29:03AM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote:
> In this case, I am part of a team working to make a shipping product, and
> there are time constraints which
> do not afford the time necessary to do that, _and_ to make forward progress
> to get the sound system working
> across a con
Hi,
Mark has already posted a follow up, but I'll try and answer any
questions you posed that he didn't cover.
'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 28/09/11 18:29 did gyre and gimble:
> > > Since we have decided not to use Pulse, prior to my time, it seemed
> > > prudent to continue with tha
On 09/30/2011 10:44 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 28/09/11 18:29 did gyre and gimble:
In this case, I am part of a team working to make a shipping product,
and there are time constraints which
do not afford the time necessary to do that, _and_ to make forward
progres
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:23:46PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> First, look at the "What's next" section of the 1.0 notes [1]. That
> points out what we think are the most important shortcomings of
> PulseAudio currently, one of them is "Routing infrastructure": while
> it is possible to writ
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 08:23:46PM +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
>
> > First, look at the "What's next" section of the 1.0 notes [1]. That
> > points out what we think are the most important shortcomings of
> > PulseAudio currently, one of the
>
> I've attached the PA config files I am using, along with the log
> output(pulselog). The most suspicious thing in there is the failure to
> get
> RT scheduling. Is there something obviously wrong with the configs that
> would cause these numbers to be so high, or to prevent 10ms latency
> wo
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:03 AM, wrote:
> >
> > I've attached the PA config files I am using, along with the log
> > output(pulselog). The most suspicious thing in there is the failure to
> > get
> > RT scheduling. Is there something obviously wrong with the configs that
> > would cause these nu
> Makes sense, I'll take a look at what pacat is actually filling the
> buffer attributes with and see if I can track this down.
here are some additional explanations. Hang on to your hat, this isn't
simple stuff:
pacat has this 'process-time-msec' parameter which defines the min_req
value (not
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 21:14 -0700, Dylan Reid wrote:
> > Obviously we're somewhat biased here, but I think it would
> be prudent of
> > you to revisit some of the previous results. Pierre has done
> a lot of
> > work on the Intel side and numerous other compa
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 21:14 -0700, Dylan Reid wrote:
> > > Obviously we're somewhat biased here, but I think it would
> > be prudent of
> > > you to revisit some of the previous results. Pierre has done
> > a l
Hi,
[I'm just concerned that Taylor is not on the PA mailing list so we need
to keep them CC'ed. Dylan is registered but CC'ing for completeness :)
This message just quotes Pierre-Louis's mail in full below (which is
certainly worth reading!)
This is my only comment]
'Twas brillig, and Pierre-
23 matches
Mail list logo
