"Jaska Uimonen" writes:
Hi Jaska,
> Hello,
>
> For some reason the company mail server is holding back the
> patches, doing some checking or what not... I sent the
> patches to the mailing list last Thursday. This happened
> to me once before, but I didn't remember to take it into
> account...
>
"Jaska Uimonen" writes:
Hi Jaska,
> Hello,
>
> For some reason the company mail server is holding back the
> patches, doing some checking or what not... I sent the
> patches to the mailing list last Thursday. This happened
> to me once before, but I didn't remember to take it into
> account...
>
Hello,
For some reason the company mail server is holding back the
patches, doing some checking or what not... I sent the
patches to the mailing list last Thursday. This happened
to me once before, but I didn't remember to take it into
account...
Anyway if they are not appearing soon to the list
Hi folks,
> Tanu Kaskinen writes:
>
> Hi Tanu,
>
>> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 17:32 -0300, Flavio Ceolin wrote:
>>> Tanu Kaskinen writes:
>>> > There were problems with the code. I don't remember what exactly was
>>> > broken, though. But at least I didn't like the concurrency handling: I
>>> > real
Tanu Kaskinen writes:
Hi Tanu,
> On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 17:32 -0300, Flavio Ceolin wrote:
>> Tanu Kaskinen writes:
>> > There were problems with the code. I don't remember what exactly was
>> > broken, though. But at least I didn't like the concurrency handling: I
>> > really dislike doing inter
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 17:32 -0300, Flavio Ceolin wrote:
> Tanu Kaskinen writes:
> > There were problems with the code. I don't remember what exactly was
> > broken, though. But at least I didn't like the concurrency handling: I
> > really dislike doing inter-thread communication by using shared
>
Tanu Kaskinen writes:
Hi Tanu,
First of all, thanks for the answer.
> On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 14:35 -0300, Flavio Ceolin wrote:
>> Hi floks,
>>
>> I'm trying to implement support for audio envelopes on pulse audio and
>> several doubts come to me. First i've checked that we already had
>> suppor
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 14:35 -0300, Flavio Ceolin wrote:
> Hi floks,
>
> I'm trying to implement support for audio envelopes on pulse audio and
> several doubts come to me. First i've checked that we already had
> support for it, but it was removed. So my first doubt is, there were
> problems with
Hi floks,
I'm trying to implement support for audio envelopes on pulse audio and
several doubts come to me. First i've checked that we already had
support for it, but it was removed. So my first doubt is, there were
problems with this code or it was removed just because no one was using ?
For pur
