Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-12-12 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 22:06 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 03 November 2016 14:53:42 Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Excellent. Having the first RC within november/early december makes > > me think having version 10 (or at least a late RC + cherry-picked > > fixes) will be the best choice. > >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-12-11 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 03 November 2016 14:53:42 Felipe Sateler wrote: > On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to > >> plan for it.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to >> plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I >> should try to get

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Hi, > > The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to > plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I > should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9. > > Currently, the freeze is

[pulseaudio-discuss] Thinking about pulseaudio for debian stretch

2016-11-03 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi, The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9. Currently, the freeze is planned for february 5th, with a no-new-packages policy since january.