On Sun, 2016-12-11 at 22:06 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2016 14:53:42 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Excellent. Having the first RC within november/early december makes
> > me think having version 10 (or at least a late RC + cherry-picked
> > fixes) will be the best choice.
>
>
On Thursday 03 November 2016 14:53:42 Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to
> >> plan for it.
On 3 November 2016 at 10:41, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to
>> plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I
>> should try to get
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:03 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to
> plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I
> should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9.
>
> Currently, the freeze is
Hi,
The release of debian stretch is getting closer so I'm starting to
plan for it. Currently we are shipping 9.0. The question would be if I
should try to get 10 into stretch, or just stay with 9.
Currently, the freeze is planned for february 5th, with a
no-new-packages policy since january.