Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] gst pulsesrc and default caps

2010-08-15 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
Correcting myself: On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 06:42 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > I guess the problem is that pulsesrc doesn't know > which source is going to be used before actually starts recording. No, that's not the problem. The problem is that pulsesrc doesn't use the proper flags when creating t

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 21:32 +0200, Jan Braun wrote: > Michał Sawicz schrob: > > Google 'pulseaudio flat volume'. > > This is obviously a very desirable feature from a technical perspective. > However, I feel it's currently rather poor UI-wise. > > What I'd want and expect is a (per-soundcard) "ma

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] gst pulsesrc and default caps

2010-08-15 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 19:30 +0200, Alexey Fisher wrote: > Hallo all, > > i hacking currently on cheese and noticed "one more" performance issue. > i use web cam with "sample spec: s16le 1ch 16000Hz", if i start > gstreamer pipe it will get "float32le 1ch 44100Hz". I do not see match > sense to ups

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Dylan at 15/08/10 19:12 did gyre and gimble: > On Sunday 15 August 2010, Michał Sawicz wrote: >> 'pulseaudio flat volume' > > I just don't know what to say ... "It's this way because Vista does this"?? > [0] Just because Vista does it, does not make it automatically wrong. The

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Jan Braun
Michał Sawicz schrob: > Dnia 2010-08-15, nie o godzinie 17:03 +0100, Dylan pisze: > > I hope I have made sense and am not completely misunderstanding how > > the > > system is intendeto work, it is simply that IMHO each level slider (or > > pair) > > should be fully independent of eachother. >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Sonntag, den 15.08.2010, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Dylan: > It seems to me that the behaviour of various volume controls and their > interactions is wrong. Let me explain ... Have you already read [1]? […] Thanks, Paul [1] http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/PulseAudioStoleMyVolumes signature.asc Des

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Dylan
On Sunday 15 August 2010, Michał Sawicz wrote: > 'pulseaudio flat volume' I just don't know what to say ... "It's this way because Vista does this"?? [0] Is there any way to get the intuitively correct (to me) behaviour of one slider affecting one level? [0] http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/o

[pulseaudio-discuss] gst pulsesrc and default caps

2010-08-15 Thread Alexey Fisher
Hallo all, i hacking currently on cheese and noticed "one more" performance issue. i use web cam with "sample spec: s16le 1ch 16000Hz", if i start gstreamer pipe it will get "float32le 1ch 44100Hz". I do not see match sense to upsample stream and than get bigger file size and cpu load. Especially

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Michał Sawicz
Dnia 2010-08-15, nie o godzinie 17:03 +0100, Dylan pisze: > I hope I have made sense and am not completely misunderstanding how > the > system is intendeto work, it is simply that IMHO each level slider (or > pair) > should be fully independent of eachother. Google 'pulseaudio flat volume'. Ch

[pulseaudio-discuss] Volume control interactions

2010-08-15 Thread Dylan
It seems to me that the behaviour of various volume controls and their interactions is wrong. Let me explain ... Altering the level of the master for a Output Device results in changes being applied to all Playback Streams associated with that output. This is the case whether the volume control