Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] difference between Gnome Sound Preferences and PulseAudio Volume Control

On Monday 07 June 2010, Piscium wrote: >- Original Message > >> From: Colin Guthrie >> To: pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de >> Sent: Mon, 7 June, 2010 12:20:44 >> Subject: Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] difference between Gnome Sound >> Preferences and PulseAudio Volume Control > >As many of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] audio sync question

On Friday 21 May 2010, Daniel Chen wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 21/05/10 17:27 did gyre and gimble: >>> This morning I watched a utube link, the first 2 or 3 minutes of which >>> the audio was pretty scrambled, but as was typical it eventually got &

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] audio sync question

On Friday 21 May 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 21/05/10 17:27 did gyre and gimble: >> Greetings; >> >> This morning I watched a utube link, the first 2 or 3 minutes of which >> the audio was pretty scrambled, but as was typical it

[pulseaudio-discuss] audio sync question

Greetings; This morning I watched a utube link, the first 2 or 3 minutes of which the audio was pretty scrambled, but as was typical it eventually got itself sorted. Is this a src problem, or a PA problem? This is a 64 bit mdv-2010 install, uptodat

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] permanent microphone boost

On Tuesday 04 May 2010, Piscium wrote: >I spent a bit of time on this issue, the ephemeral mic boost. I found out a > way to consistently reproduce it: by rebooting. > >In other words, if I enable mic boost with the Alsa mixer and reboot, the > tick box is not checked anymore after booting. And thi

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Monday 19 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: [...] >The ACLs wont change for restarting PA. > >> and now the sound is sputtering, at least for the chime of incoming >> email. > >It's very hard to even try and comment about that as I have no idea what >system is being used to generate that sound in

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Monday 19 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 19/04/10 16:24 did gyre and gimble: >> On Monday 19 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 19/04/10 05:10 did gyre and gimble: >>>> And >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Monday 19 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 19/04/10 05:10 did gyre and gimble: >> And >> [r...@coyote linux-2.6.34-rc3]# getfacl /dev/snd/controlC0 >> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names >>

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Sunday 18 April 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Sun, 18.04.10 23:48, Gene Heskett (gene.hesk...@verizon.net) wrote: >> g...@coyote /]$ ls -l /dev/snd >> total 0 >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 60 2010-04-18 07:47 by-path/ >> crw-rw+ 1 root audio 116, 0

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Sunday 18 April 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Sun, 18.04.10 16:34, Gene Heskett (gene.hesk...@verizon.net) wrote: >> On Sunday 18 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> >'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 18/04/10 20:50 did gyre and gimble: >> >> On Sun, Ap

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Sunday 18 April 2010, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Sun, 18.04.10 21:09, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 18/04/10 20:50 did gyre and gimble: >> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> Pul

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Sunday 18 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 18/04/10 20:50 did gyre and gimble: >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> Pulseaudio-vvv is the file you want to click on. I am seeing a file >>> list at &l

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

On Sunday 18 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 17/04/10 21:37 did gyre and gimble: >> Greetings Colin; >> >> I rebooted to a new kernel as above, and now there is no audio, but the >> diff is that there is, but it is apparently not

[pulseaudio-discuss] New kernel 2.6.34-rc4, no audio

Greetings Colin; I rebooted to a new kernel as above, and now there is no audio, but the diff is that there is, but it is apparently not getting from PA to the sound system. pavucontrol says its using /dev/null for a sink. But if I crank up the mic gain the sound is alive & well. kde when st

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Thursday 15 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 15/04/10 14:44 did gyre and gimble: >> Aha! I found it! I configured kmix to show me every channel, which >> makes it about 2x my 1680 screen width, and pulled its window to about >> 1/

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Thursday 15 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 14/04/10 22:05 did gyre and gimble: >>> I forgot to ask, but can you now give "pacmd ls" output now that the >>> server is running? >> >> That is also pretty v

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 14/04/10 17:30 did gyre and gimble: >> On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 14/04/10 16:38 did gyre and gimble: >>>> O

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 14/04/10 16:38 did gyre and gimble: >> On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 13/04/10 01:38 did gyre and gimble: >>>> On M

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 13/04/10 01:38 did gyre and gimble: >> On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 20:29 did gyre and gimble: >>>> draks

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 13/04/10 07:12 did gyre and gimble: >> Colin; Th data you asked for exceeded the message size limit by about >> 140k, and is being held by the moderator. > >Ahh OK. I'm not a mo

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 13/04/10 07:12 did gyre and gimble: >> Colin; Th data you asked for exceeded the message size limit by about >> 140k, and is being held by the moderator. > >Ahh OK. I'm not a mo

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 20:29 did gyre and gimble: >> draksound, re-enabled, was on before by other means, and enabled user >> switching. No sound yet. >> pacmd.ls.out attached. > >Hmm, what is

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 16:31 did gyre and gimble: >> On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 07:34 did gyre and gimble: >>>> How do I g

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 16:31 did gyre and gimble: >> On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 07:34 did gyre and gimble: >>>> How do I g

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 07:34 did gyre and gimble: >> How do I go about starting or restarting PA from a root shell? None of >> the other paman or pactl utilities can connect to the server so >> ev

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

On Monday 12 April 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 12/04/10 07:34 did gyre and gimble: >> How do I go about starting or restarting PA from a root shell? None of >> the other paman or pactl utilities can connect to the server so >> ev

[pulseaudio-discuss] Hpw to start the pa server

Greetings; I have now blacklisted the modules for the hardware that pulse is not supposed to see or use, and have rmmod'd them also. The kmix mixer window no longer shows the 2 audio system this system has that should be ignored, only showing the emu10k1 (audigy2 Value) facilities. This is an

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] M-Audio FastTrack Pro

On Friday 08 January 2010, David Kågedal wrote: >Lennart Poettering writes: >> On Thu, 07.01.10 17:31, David Kågedal (dav...@lysator.liu.se) wrote: >>> >> Sure, I will do that. But I'm still not sure I understand why we >>> >> aren't using then perfectly good name "M-Audio FastTrack Pro" that >>>

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Monday 04 January 2010, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: >ma, 2010-01-04 kello 09:37 +, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: >> As for the next stage I'm not an expert on this but I think you can try >> adding: >> >> [Element IEC985 Optical Raw] >> switch = mute > >"switch = mute" makes the mixer element state foll

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Monday 04 January 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 03/01/10 22:58 did gyre and gimble: >> Unforch, some of the pa stuff I apparently need, is missing from the >> mirrors mandriva uses. So pamon and padev* are not installed. Is there >>

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Daniel Chen wrote: >On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> 01:07.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB0400 Audigy2 Value >>Subsystem: Creative Labs Device 1001 >>Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Bill Cox wrote: >No, this is extremely unlikely, and nothing to worry about. Lawyers >in the USA only sue people with money. > >Bill Chuckle back at ya Bill, and you are probably right. But the word probably still bothers me. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 12:29 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >> Regardless, this problem for the visually impaired is one that needs to >> be addressed ASAP before we have a whole battalion of lawyers from the >> ACLU challenging us

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio in general - does it make sense?

On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Gene Heskett wrote: >On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Colin Guthrie wrote: >>'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 22/12/09 20:49 did gyre and gimble: >>> On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Arun Raghavan wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2009-12-22

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 03/01/10 17:48 did gyre and gimble: >> And it seem like a doable, sane approach to the problem. A voice of >> sanity midst the riot this could become. >> >:) >: >> But that

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Ng Oon-Ee at 03/01/10 13:26 did gyre and gimble: >> So, in my simplistic and user-centric point-of-view, I wonder if >> speechd-up accepts audio INPUTS? Perhaps it could act as a pulseaudio >> sink, with the appropriate modules, of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

On Sunday 03 January 2010, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: >On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 07:41 -0500, Bill Cox wrote: >> Hi, Colin. I disagree that speech-dispatcher and speechd-up are >> broken and need to be fixed. speechd-up is a root daemon attached to >> the /dev/softsynth device. I see no utility in having mult

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio in general - does it make sense?

On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Colin Guthrie wrote: >'Twas brillig, and Gene Heskett at 22/12/09 20:49 did gyre and gimble: >> On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Arun Raghavan wrote: >>> On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 12:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> [...] >>> >&

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio in general - does it make sense?

On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Arun Raghavan wrote: >On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 12:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: >[...] > >> Coding is kewl, I do it myself on smaller systems, but where are the man >> pages that should allow us to make it Just Work(TM)? > >[...] > >

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulseaudio in general - does it make sense?

On Monday 21 December 2009, Colin Guthrie wrote: >Hello once again. > > >As an opener to your mail I will point out that at no point to you refer >to any of the technical reasons as to why PA adoption is a good thing. >All you do is point out the fact that you've had a few problems (and as >someone

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] not allowed to configure local sound server

On Monday 01 June 2009, H.S. wrote: >Hello, > >On a Debian Testing machine, I have noticed that I am no longer allowed >to configure local sound server in pulseaudio device chooser (got by >padevchooser), presumably after some relevant upgrade in the recent few >weeks. The option in the various tab