The network latency is not that critical. Rather I would like the
loopback-module latency to be minimal. So that when I speak I wont hear
my own words with a delay, which is disturbing when the delay grows too
long.
What I am trying to do is use the existing Pulseaudio tools to connect
machin
Daniel Chen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Jukka Kommeri wrote:
I'm trying out a set up that uses rtp-modules and the loopback module. The
latencies seem ok, though they could be better, but after a minute long
session I start getting the following messages and the sound def
Hello
I'm trying out a set up that uses rtp-modules and the loopback module.
The latencies seem ok, though they could be better, but after a minute
long session I start getting the following messages and the sound
deformed because of it.
D: module-rtp-recv.c: Updating sample rate
D: module-r
João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Jukka Kommeri wrote:
Another question, is it possible to split the stream from source to
both rtp-send and local sink?
I am sorry? I don't get the question, but loopback= might be the
option your a re lookin
Another question, is it possible to split the stream from source to
both rtp-send and local sink?
I am sorry? I don't get the question, but loopback= might be the
option your a re looking for.
Lennart
The loop of module-rtp-send has been the solution for me. But I have
noticed that t
Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 28.07.09 14:36, Jukka Kommeri (jukka.komm...@cern.ch) wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying out the rtp-features of Pulseaudio in Ubuntu. So far the only pulseaudio and distributiuon combination that seems to have worked for has been Hardy. With hardy and
n
the other it starts requesting rewinds after a few seconds due to "end of
underrun". I admit that I am not that familiar with Linux sound world so I
might be forgetting very basic things and any help is appreciated.
Best regards,
Jukka Kommeri
ps. This is the hardware I have and I ma
