Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Fixing git branches

2010-05-09 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 14:30 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: I've just done a git cherry and pushed 5 patches to master (although one of those I'd only just committed to stable-queue so really master only had 4 missing commits). Excellent, thank you! For some reason I thought stable-queue had

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Fixing git branches

2010-05-08 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and pl bossart at 07/05/10 14:34 did gyre and gimble: The rules documented in http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/GitBranches seem sensible to me, but the documentation doesn't match reality: according to the wiki page, there should be a branch named 0.9.21-stable, but there isn't, and

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Fixing git branches

2010-05-07 Thread pl bossart
The rules documented in http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/GitBranches seem sensible to me, but the documentation doesn't match reality: according to the wiki page, there should be a branch named 0.9.21-stable, but there isn't, and all commits in stable-queue should also be in master, but they

[pulseaudio-discuss] Fixing git branches

2010-05-06 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
Hello, The rules documented in http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/GitBranches seem sensible to me, but the documentation doesn't match reality: according to the wiki page, there should be a branch named 0.9.21-stable, but there isn't, and all commits in stable-queue should also be in master, but they