> -Original Message-
> From: pulseaudio-discuss-boun...@mail.0pointer.de
> [mailto:pulseaudio-discuss-boun...@mail.0pointer.de] On
> Behalf Of Colin Guthrie
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 3:27 PM
> To: pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
> Subject: Re: [pulseaud
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 09/12/10 16:12 did gyre and gimble:
> 'Twas brillig, and Kulikov, Vitaliy at 01/12/10 17:34 did gyre and gimble:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I would like to add more details for issue #1. Just changing order of
>> the capture and MIC volume controls in the path is
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 07/12/10 08:35 did gyre and gimble:
> On 2010-12-04 19:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 02/12/10 10:38 did gyre and
>>> Let's play with the idea that we added a configurable "Direction" key to
>>> these profiles that control
'Twas brillig, and Kulikov, Vitaliy at 01/12/10 17:34 did gyre and gimble:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to add more details for issue #1. Just changing order of
> the capture and MIC volume controls in the path is not enough if those
> volumes have gain only ranges and the reason is that, A
Hello everybody,
I would like to add more details for issue #1. Just changing order of
the capture and MIC volume controls in the path is not enough if those
volumes have gain only ranges and the reason is that, AFAIK, currently
PA adjusts requested volume to the higher HW volume step. But if we
c
On 2010-12-04 19:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 02/12/10 10:38 did gyre and gimble:
On 2010-12-01 16:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 01/12/10 13:55 did gyre and
gimble:
Hi folks,
The way we control mic input is quite broken. I
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 02/12/10 10:38 did gyre and gimble:
> On 2010-12-01 16:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 01/12/10 13:55 did gyre and
>> gimble:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> The way we control mic input is quite broken. I've tested here with both
>>
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 11:38:08AM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> Hmm. I remember Lennart's original approach would have been to maximize
> signal quality (i e, move "Master" and let "PCM" stay at 0 dB). Moving
> this analogy to the input case, what would be the highest quality for 20
> d
On 2010-12-01 16:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 01/12/10 13:55 did gyre and gimble:
Hi folks,
The way we control mic input is quite broken. I've tested here with both
IDT codecs and Realtek codecs (the two most common HDA Codecs AFAIK) and
as far as I see they'
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:09:10PM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> wouldn't hurt anyway... that said, WTF is the diffrence between a front
> and rear mic physically on a laptop? Do they *really* make laptops with
> two mics on them for this purpose? (from the names I'd have to expect a
> yes answer
'Twas brillig, and David Henningsson at 01/12/10 13:55 did gyre and gimble:
> Hi folks,
>
> The way we control mic input is quite broken. I've tested here with both
> IDT codecs and Realtek codecs (the two most common HDA Codecs AFAIK) and
> as far as I see they're both broken in the same ways.
>
Hi folks,
The way we control mic input is quite broken. I've tested here with both
IDT codecs and Realtek codecs (the two most common HDA Codecs AFAIK) and
as far as I see they're both broken in the same ways.
Let's assume that we have an internal mic and an external mic jack, with
autoswitc
12 matches
Mail list logo
