Belgarath wrote:
>
> I do not remember if I mentioned it before or it has any meaning but I am
> running solaris on x86
>
Ah, bummer. Then I can't help you. I have only Sparc-machines so I do
not have an environment for building x86.
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Te
On Thursday 21 September 2006 08:52, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 September 2006 08:59, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >> Paul Ryszka wrote:
> >>> Can you get me this binary package ?
> >>
> >> Enjoy.
> >
> > Thanks Pierre but I have another problem. :))
> > I am just wondering
Belgarath wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 08:59, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> Paul Ryszka wrote:
>>> Can you get me this binary package ?
>> Enjoy.
>
> Thanks Pierre but I have another problem. :))
> I am just wondering when you will be in a state of mind to curse anytiome you
> see my nick :)
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 08:59, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Paul Ryszka wrote:
> > Can you get me this binary package ?
>
> Enjoy.
Thanks Pierre but I have another problem. :))
I am just wondering when you will be in a state of mind to curse anytiome you
see my nick :)
I propably have to use some
On Friday 01 September 2006 14:11, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 11:37, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >> Belgarath wrote:
> >>> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> > -
Paul Ryszka wrote:
>
> because I couldn't get this autoreconf -fi to work under solaris
> I made it under linux:
> in the first scenario I tried to rerun ./configure under solaris and it was
> saying that there is plenty of present but not usable dependencies
Log please.
> in the second attempt
On Friday 01 September 2006 14:11, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 11:37, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >> Belgarath wrote:
> >>> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> > -
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:37, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> >> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> >>> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
> >>
> >> Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make sure the m4 files
Belgarath wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:37, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> Belgarath wrote:
>>> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make su
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:37, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> >> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> >>> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
> >>
> >> Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make sure the m4 files
Belgarath wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
>>> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
>> Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make sure the m4 files there are loaded, that
>> should solve the macro errors.
>
> unfortun
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 10:44:42 +0100
Belgarath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
> aclocal:configure.ac:250: warning: macro `AM_ICONV' not found in
> library You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
> You should update your `aclocal.m4' by running aclocal.
It s
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> > -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
>
> Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make sure the m4 files there are loaded, that
> should solve the macro errors.
unfortunately it gives exactly s
On Friday 01 September 2006 11:44, Belgarath wrote:
> -bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
Use "autoreconf -fi -I m4" to make sure the m4 files there are loaded, that
should solve the macro errors.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Vid
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:20, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here it goes.
> > BTW are we only people on this list ?
>
> The only Solaris users at least. :)
>
-bash-3.00# autoreconf -fi
aclocal:configure.ac:250: warning: macro `AM_ICONV' not found in library
You should upd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here it goes.
> BTW are we only people on this list ?
>
The only Solaris users at least. :)
Try the following patch and see if it helps (you might need to run
"autoreconf -fi and re-run ./configure"):
Index: configure.ac
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:07:19 +0100
Belgarath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we only people on the list ?
Not quite, but the only Solaris box I have in my reach is an old
roaring Sun E4500, which is currently offline :) (as long as it's a
Solaris-specific problem)
best regards, /etc :)
--
[
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 15:30, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > I am building it directly on the box
> > but I can cross-compile it if it helps. I have couple of linux boxes
> > there. Anyway what should be in this values ?
> > maybe I can set them up manually ?
>
> They'll be destroye
Belgarath wrote:
> I am building it directly on the box
> but I can cross-compile it if it helps. I have couple of linux boxes there.
> Anyway what should be in this values ?
> maybe I can set them up manually ?
They'll be destroyed whenever you re-run the script, so it's much better
if we can fig
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 07:29, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > On Monday 28 August 2006 15:27, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >> grep XOPEN config.h
> >
> > /* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE */
> > /* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED */
>
I am building it directly on the box
but I can cross-compile it if
Belgarath wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 15:27, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> grep XOPEN config.h
> /* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE */
> /* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED */
Now there's the problem. Are you building this in a cross-compiling
environment or directly on the box? The configure script doesn't see
On Monday 28 August 2006 15:27, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> grep XOPEN config.h
/* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE */
/* #undef _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED */
___
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pu
Belgarath wrote:
> On Monday 28 August 2006 07:43, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> What does "gcc -dumpmachine" give you?
> i386-pc-solaris2.8
>
That looks correct. How about 'grep XOPEN config.h'?
--
Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology
System Developer Telephone: +
On Monday 28 August 2006 07:43, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Belgarath wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to compile pulseaduio on solaris for last couple of days. At
> > first It had some problems with the header files so I upgraded to gcc v4
> > now I am getting the following error message :
> > modules
Belgarath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to compile pulseaduio on solaris for last couple of days. At first It
> had some problems with the header files so I upgraded to gcc v4 now I am
> getting the following error message :
> modules/rtp/rtp.c: In function âpa_rtp_sendâ:
> modules/rtp/rtp.c:111:
Hello,
I tried to compile pulseaduio on solaris for last couple of days. At first It
had some problems with the header files so I upgraded to gcc v4 now I am
getting the following error message :
modules/rtp/rtp.c: In function âpa_rtp_sendâ:
modules/rtp/rtp.c:111: error: âstruct msghdrâ has no m
26 matches
Mail list logo
