[pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
I'm using Archlinux 64-bit (x86_64), and am having trouble compiling pulseaudio from git (or even release tarballs) unless CHOST is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. By default my CHOST is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is this an issue with something being hardcoded to the pulse makefiles? Easy to work around, thou

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 15:22, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm using Archlinux 64-bit (x86_64), and am having trouble compiling > pulseaudio from git (or even release tarballs) unless CHOST is > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. By default my CHOST is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Is > this an issue with somet

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
I guess I'll ignore the LDFLAGS stuff, just brought it up because when I questioned the Arch devs about the new LDFLAGS they mentioned that these were added because most current software should have no problems with the flags used. And now that I look at it, the -Wl is just part of -Wl,--as-needed,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > Sorry, I was just wondering whether its a known issue. When I try to > compile with CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I get errors about undefined > reference to `lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols` in various functions. > If you wish the exact error m

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 15:54, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 09:31 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 30.09.09 15:22, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > I'm using Archlinux 64-bit (x86_64), and am having trouble compiling > > > pulseaudio from git (or

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 16:08, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Sorry, I was just wondering whether its a known issue. When I try to > > compile with CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, I get errors about undefined > > reference to `lt__PROGRAM__LTX

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Nix
On 30 Sep 2009, Lennart Poettering said: > No, --as-needed is a klduge. We explicitly don't support that because > there is a cyclic dep between libpulse and libpulsecommon. Try to > google or grep the archives for an explanation for that. You might want to add a -Wl,--no-as-needed then, 'cos more

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-09-30 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 17:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 30.09.09 16:08, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:54 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > > Sorry, I was just wondering whether its a known issue. When I try to > > > compile with CHOST=x86_64-pc-l

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Unable to compile for some values of CHOST (on x86_64)

2009-10-02 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 30.09.09 19:36, Nix (n...@esperi.org.uk) wrote: > > On 30 Sep 2009, Lennart Poettering said: > > No, --as-needed is a klduge. We explicitly don't support that because > > there is a cyclic dep between libpulse and libpulsecommon. Try to > > google or grep the archives for an explanation f