On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> I just read the blog post
>
> Please use unambiguous tag names in your DVCS [1]
>
> which for security reasons suggests to use unambiguous tag names.
>
> Therefore I suggest to change our tag name scheme to the following.
>
> pa_0
Hiya,
'Twas brillig, and Paul Menzel at 07/05/11 09:22 did gyre and gimble:
> I just read the blog post
>
> Please use unambiguous tag names in your DVCS [1]
>
> which for security reasons suggests to use unambiguous tag names.
>
> Therefore I suggest to change our tag name scheme to the
Dear PulseAudio folks,
I just read the blog post
Please use unambiguous tag names in your DVCS [1]
which for security reasons suggests to use unambiguous tag names.
Therefore I suggest to change our tag name scheme to the following.
pa_0.9.22 or pa_1.0
Thanks,
Paul
[1] ht