[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet) Closed pull request: Ticket/2.7.x/7274

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
On Fri Nov 18 00:33:36 UTC 2011 pull request #19 was closed. Ticket/2.7.x/7274 requested by (nanliu) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com.

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet) New pull request: Tickets/2.7.x/7274 always output 4 digit modes

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
Please review pull request #226: Tickets/2.7.x/7274 always output 4 digit modes opened by (jhelwig) Description: When updating file mode, output 4 digit file mode instead of omitting the leading 0, i.e. 0755 instead of 755. This fully represents the file mode, and lessen

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet) New pull request: (#10923) Fix device support for --configprint.

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
Please review pull request #225: (#10923) Fix device support for --configprint. opened by (nanliu) Description: Currently puppet device --configprint all results in a puppet device run, instead of printing the puppet device configuration setting. This patch updates device

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet) Closed pull request: #10799 Regexp escaping too much

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
On Thu Nov 17 21:29:21 UTC 2011 pull request #220 was closed. #10799 Regexp escaping too much requested by (joshcooper) The pull request was merged by: jhelwig -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread Trevor Vaughan
The problem that I'm having is getting the autoloader to find it. I've called it 'module Foobar' with no luck. Should I be using a require with file expansion? Trevor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Jeff McCune wrote: > What ruby module name are you using?  Could you just keep your utility >

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread Jeff McCune
What ruby module name are you using? Could you just keep your utility code out of Puppet's namespace? -- Jeff McCune - (+1-503-208-4484) On Nov 17, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > That works fine for providers but I'm trying to do it for a custom > function which isn't being so frie

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet-acceptance) Closed pull request: solaris machine isn't using dhcp, fixing test

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
On Thu Nov 17 20:12:24 UTC 2011 pull request #84 was closed. solaris machine isn't using dhcp, fixing test requested by (mykhyggz) The pull request was merged by: mykhyggz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread Trevor Vaughan
That works fine for providers but I'm trying to do it for a custom function which isn't being so friendly. Thanks, Trevor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > Trevor Vaughan wrote: >> Negatory. >> >> I tried several variations, including adding a >> /.../puppet/modules/lib/p

[Puppet-dev] Open Source Team update 2011-11-17

2011-11-17 Thread Jacob Helwig
We have been working on going through the list of submitted patches in Patchwork[0], and the open pull requests in GitHub[1][2][3]. There has been activity on a number of them, but not all with activity have resulted in merged changes. We also recently finished work on a fix for the problem of us

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread James Turnbull
Trevor Vaughan wrote: > Negatory. > > I tried several variations, including adding a > /.../puppet/modules/lib/puppet/util directory but that didn't work at > all. > > Of course, I could have just been doing it wrong :-/ > > I seem to remember this working in old versions but I'm not quite sure.

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread Trevor Vaughan
Negatory. I tried several variations, including adding a /.../puppet/modules/lib/puppet/util directory but that didn't work at all. Of course, I could have just been doing it wrong :-/ I seem to remember this working in old versions but I'm not quite sure. Thanks, Trevor On Thu, Nov 17, 2011

Re: [Puppet-dev] Is is possible to have common defines used in server side functions and still be self contained in a module?

2011-11-17 Thread Luke Kanies
On Nov 16, 2011, at 6:54 PM, Trevor Vaughan wrote: > I'd like to be able to add something like the 'util' space in my > module that my custom functions could load to assist in common tasks. > > Am I missing a way to do this in the 2.7 series? I believe it's possible - you just have to include th

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet-dashboard) New pull request: (#10902) Float and block individual node sections

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
Please review pull request #61: (#10902) Float and block individual node sections opened by (devonharless) Description: Individual node view's sections were not floating and clearing correctly, causing content to wrap. Add clearfix after classes section and class type hal

[Puppet-dev] (puppetlabs/puppet-acceptance) Closed pull request: Typo with missing the second 'c' in dhcpcd

2011-11-17 Thread wearetherobots
On Thu Nov 17 18:57:56 UTC 2011 pull request #83 was closed. Typo with missing the second 'c' in dhcpcd requested by (mykhyggz) The pull request was merged by: mykhyggz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" g

Re: [Puppet-dev] OCSP support

2011-11-17 Thread Brice Figureau
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 08:30 +0100, david-dasz wrote: > On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:51:31 +0100, Brice Figureau > wrote: > > The plan is to support server validation from the client, through OCSP > > (but not the reverse). To be really secure, the server should be > > distinct from the CA. > > To be ab