Hi Matthaus,
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:25:02 PM UTC-7, Matthaus Litteken wrote:
>
> The builds of puppet require ruby, but are built with ruby 1.8 (at
> least on EL 5 and 6, and Fedora 15 and 16), so
> they put all of puppet's lib in the sitelibdir of the ruby they were
> built with, so they
Hi Jeff,
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:14:05 PM UTC-7, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jos Backus >
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any chance we will see Ruby 1.9-compatible RPMs for Puppet 3.0.0 and
> Facter
> > 2.0.0 soon?
>
> Jos,
>
> We're currently building and maintai
The builds of puppet require ruby, but are built with ruby 1.8 (at
least on EL 5 and 6, and Fedora 15 and 16), so
they put all of puppet's lib in the sitelibdir of the ruby they were
built with, so they go in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 . For EL, we
support whatever ruby distros have available and
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any chance we will see Ruby 1.9-compatible RPMs for Puppet 3.0.0 and Facter
> 2.0.0 soon?
Jos,
We're currently building and maintaining our own ruby 1.8.7 packages
and the Puppet and Facter RPM's depend on these. What Ruby 1.9
packages
Hi,
Any chance we will see Ruby 1.9-compatible RPMs for Puppet 3.0.0 and Facter
2.0.0 soon?
Thanks,
Jos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-dev/
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Andy Parker wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Aaron Grewell
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Stahnke
>> wrote:
>>> Puppet 3.0.0 is a feature release for the 3.x series of Puppet.
>
> On the whole what I want to see if a 3.x line of p
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Aaron Grewell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Michael Stahnke
> wrote:
>> Puppet 3.0.0 is a feature release for the 3.x series of Puppet.
>
>> * Semantic Versioning - With 3.0.0, Puppet Labs makes a commitment to
>> follow the Semantic Versioning guidel
I'll take a look at this.
Thanks Gary!
--
Later,
Darin
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Gary Larizza wrote:
> I always like looking back at the work RI did in the facts-dot-d
> facter fact for something like this -->
> https://github.com/ripienaar/facter-facts/blob/master/facts-dot-d/facter_do
I always like looking back at the work RI did in the facts-dot-d
facter fact for something like this -->
https://github.com/ripienaar/facter-facts/blob/master/facts-dot-d/facter_dot_d.rb#L39-51
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Darin Perusich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the best way to evaluate the
Hello,
What is the best way to evaluate the variables set in a config file in
a provider? The variables in the file are setup like MY_VAR="foo bar
baz".
I currently have this little piece of code working but it's certainly
not very elegant so I'm looking for some guidance.
IO.read(/some/file.cfg
Thanks Markus!
--
Later,
Darin
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, markus wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a provider and it needs to parce the output from a
>> command that's space separated on a single line. So far I've been
>> unsuccessful at splitting it up so I can loop thru the values to see
>> if
11 matches
Mail list logo
