[Puppet-dev] Re: RFC - Resource Defaults and Collection

2014-07-07 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 2014-07-07 20:54, John Bollinger wrote: On Monday, July 7, 2014 9:39:06 AM UTC-5, henrik lindberg wrote: On 2014-07-07 15:43, John Bollinger wrote: [...] Consider: > > class mymodule { >File { group => 'example' } > } > > class mymodule::example {

[Puppet-dev] Re: RFC - Resource Defaults and Collection

2014-07-07 Thread John Bollinger
On Monday, July 7, 2014 9:39:06 AM UTC-5, henrik lindberg wrote: > > On 2014-07-07 15:43, John Bollinger wrote: > [...] Consider: > > > > class mymodule { > >File { group => 'example' } > > } > > > > class mymodule::example { > >file { '/tmp/example': owner => 'root', ensure => '

[Puppet-dev] Re: RFC: Remove resource default support for classes?

2014-07-07 Thread John Bollinger
On Friday, July 4, 2014 9:42:00 AM UTC-5, henrik lindberg wrote: > > Next up in the quest to understand and specify how defaults work / > should work is the support to set class parameters via the resource > default expression. > > You can do this, to set defaults on classes > > class a

[Puppet-dev] Re: RFC - Resource Defaults and Collection

2014-07-07 Thread Henrik Lindberg
On 2014-07-07 15:43, John Bollinger wrote: On Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:29:48 PM UTC-5, henrik lindberg wrote: On 2014-03-07 22:57, John Bollinger wrote: > Here's another idea: how about removing resource defaults altogether? > My take on them has always been that their dynami

[Puppet-dev] Re: RFC - Resource Defaults and Collection

2014-07-07 Thread John Bollinger
On Thursday, July 3, 2014 8:29:48 PM UTC-5, henrik lindberg wrote: > > On 2014-03-07 22:57, John Bollinger wrote: > > Here's another idea: how about removing resource defaults altogether? > > My take on them has always been that their dynamic scope was their most > > important feature. If tha