On Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:24:13 PM UTC-5, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
I'm voting for putting all your notes somewhere very easy to find in the
future and then leaving everything the way it has been working.
Agreed. If Puppet does not actually support BigDecimal now, then I don't
think
I'm wondering if anyone has a relatively straightforward way to allow a
group of Puppet Masters to access a shared data table in PuppetDB to which
they can read and write named JSON objects.
No other hosts should be able to access the data.
Thanks,
Trevor
--
Trevor Vaughan
Vice President,
I'm wondering if anyone has a relatively straightforward way to allow a
group of Puppet Masters to access a shared data table in PuppetDB to which
they can read and write named JSON objects.
No other hosts should be able to access the data.
Nothing like this has been provided formally today.
I like the word 'formally'. Any informal material that you know of?
If I can get what I want working, I'll push upstream, but it's always
easier to start from a base.
Thanks,
Trevor
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Ken Barber k...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has a
As previously announced[1], Saucy has now been removed from our
public apt repositories, as it reached end of life on July 17, 2014[2].
[1] - *https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/jWvnE688bD4/ZEcOVDwmmCcJ
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/jWvnE688bD4/ZEcOVDwmmCcJ*
[2] -
We've removed the Puppet 4.0 jobs from Jenkins and have deleted the
puppet-4 branch. There were no pull requests from the community against
puppet-4 so this should have minimal impact. Moving forward, all pull
requests that add features should be targeted at the master branch.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014
Can you flesh out a bit more what you are looking for? If I'm reading
between the lines correctly you may be better served with a database backed
hiera backend.
On Sep 15, 2014 9:04 AM, Trevor Vaughan tvaug...@onyxpoint.com wrote:
I like the word 'formally'. Any informal material that you know
If this was just a troll, I'll speak the unfortunate truth - please keep
that on the puppet-users list, which is increasingly filling with it.
If this was a legitimate question, I'd guess you have some horrible
misconfiguration
- ActiveRecord was barely functional at best, and riddled with
Puppet 3.7.1 is a backward-compatible bugfix release in the Puppet 3
series. This release fixes several regressions and other issues.
* PUP-3222: Windows service provider references a non-existent
class
* PUP-3190: each no longer supported in Puppet 3.7.0
* PUP-3191:
I'm actually looking for a way to add dynamically created data items to a
common data store for multiple clustered puppet masters.
Various Ideas:
Redis or Riak: One per Puppet Master
Pros: Fast and probably redundant enough
Cons: Possibly not atomic enough and adds a lot of complexity
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jakov Sosic jso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I asked on puppet-users but I think I made a mistake, this seems to me
more like a question for puppet-dev. Sorry if it's not :(
So, to allow me to easier debug my providers, I sometimes wanna use
'command' in my
If I understand it correctly,
What about writing one Hiera backend . This should be easy, and you will
leverage all the hiera puppet support and compatibility.
You could write a redis or riak hiera backend.
I don't, think writing this using postgres or mysql would scale at least
for writes. But
Unfortunately, I probably am looking at yet another layer of infrastructure
glue for clustering.
In this case, writes aren't only infrequent, they're downright rare but
reads will happen at each compile.
I'm not sure if, in this case, adding the extra layer of Hiera makes sense
since it would
13 matches
Mail list logo
