On Fri, 15 May 2015 at 00:59 Joshua hoblitt wrote:
> As I'm slowly updating my modules' testing boilerplate for puppet 4.x,
> I've run into a couple cases of breakage that I'm unsure if they are
> intentional changes in semantics or regressions.
>
> When introspecting on a resource and the param
On Thu, 14 May 2015 at 21:45 Trevor Vaughan wrote:
> Hmmwhat about a concept of deferred actions?
>
> I.e. Try this resource, can't do it, shove it (and it's dependencies) to
> the bottom of the stack and do everything else, then come back to it.
>
If puppet would think that the provider is
As I'm slowly updating my modules' testing boilerplate for puppet 4.x,
I've run into a couple cases of breakage that I'm unsure if they are
intentional changes in semantics or regressions.
When introspecting on a resource and the param is undefined, an empty
string is now being returned instea
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Trevor Vaughan
wrote:
> - I've also moved away from the model of directly querying to perform the
>> same actions through a service registration/discovery system (in my case
>> consul)
>
>
> Interesting, were you doing these in the providers/on the clients, or at
>
> - I've also moved away from the model of directly querying to perform the
> same actions through a service registration/discovery system (in my case
> consul)
Interesting, were you doing these in the providers/on the clients, or at
catalog compile time?
I was thinking it would be a catalog c
On Thursday, May 14, 2015 at 12:11:19 PM UTC-7, Spencer Krum wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> There is currently a PR against stdlib that I am writing to you today
> about: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib/pull/444
> Thanks to Spredzy for making this PR.
>
> This is tracked in jira:
>
Hmmwhat about a concept of deferred actions?
I.e. Try this resource, can't do it, shove it (and it's dependencies) to
the bottom of the stack and do everything else, then come back to it.
You could even technically have a method for simply backgrounding that
entire resource chain.
This sort
Hey! Do you have a link to that presentation?
For a Java spin lock, wouldn't it go something like:
* First try -> Wait until timeout
* Timeout -> Drop file
* Second try -> Notice and remove file
* Try again
* etc...
Trevor
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> Trevor,
>
> I
Trevor,
I agree that if you take it to its logical conclusion you end up with
semaphores stored in consul and a handful of Puppet resources to
interact with them. Dan Bode presented on exactly this (and what doesn't
work well about it) at the PDX Puppet Users group last month.
I think though that
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> There is currently a PR against stdlib that I am writing to you today
> about: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib/pull/444
> Thanks to Spredzy for making this PR.
>
> This is tracked in jira:
> https://tickets.pupp
Ugh, sorry all, didn't mean to make that so rant-ish.
Anyway, it would seem that you would not want to hold up a catalog
compilation or application for this. Instead, you would want to register
the check with a service that could drop a queriable entity that could be
used by Puppet for making deci
I'd like to counter this limited use case with my rant about semaphores
from five years ago:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.puppet.devel/13039.
Followed by the conversation from two years ago.
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/16187
What you want is cross-node synchronization
We have something almost exactly the same as this that we use internally.
We
also have a http_conn_validator that we use for services more like PuppetDB
that need to do a HTTP request against a specific URI, or look for a
specific
HTTP result code. This has been huge for us to be able to automa
Hi Folks,
There is currently a PR against stdlib that I am writing to you today
about: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-stdlib/pull/444
Thanks to Spredzy for making this PR.
This is tracked in jira:
https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/MODULES-1982
This pattern has poked up a few differ
On 2015-14-05 12:58, Alessandro Franceschi wrote:
Hi all,
sorry to bother, I should probably search around better but I'm quite
confident that I can find here a quick solution.
I've this issue: https://github.com/example42/puppi/issues/123 in a
function which tries to use the hiera function as f
Hi all,
sorry to bother, I should probably search around better but I'm quite
confident that I can find here a quick solution.
I've this issue: https://github.com/example42/puppi/issues/123 in a
function which tries to use the hiera function as follows:
value = function_hiera(["#{module_name}_#
16 matches
Mail list logo
