On Friday, September 18, 2015 at 8:54:24 AM UTC-5, Trevor Vaughan wrote:
>
> Hi Kylo,
>
> I've never used this approach since I took the assumption that my facts
> may be used outside of/before all of my Puppet manifests were fully
> installed.
>
> It did, at times, dictate either code duplicat
I saw a fact recently that utilized the package type to lookup if a package
was installed. It seemed like a cool hack considering the amount of code
it takes to see if a package is installed on windows. So I thought I might
see if I could do the same thing with my bmc type. My other approach i
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:02 AM Trevor Vaughan
wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> It's part of the 'property' Object:
> https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/blob/master/lib/puppet/property.rb#L186
>
Related references:
http://www.rubydoc.info/gems/puppet/Puppet/Property (same thing, the rdoc
view)
https://
Hi Corey,
It's part of the 'property' Object:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/blob/master/lib/puppet/property.rb#L186
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Corey Osman wrote:
> Where is this documented or exist in the puppet codebase as this is
> exactly what I was looking for.
>
> On Thursday
Where is this documented or exist in the puppet codebase as this is exactly
what I was looking for.
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 11:48:17 AM UTC-7, Reid Vandewiele wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 6:19:27 PM UTC-7, Corey Osman wrote:
>>
>>
>> [...] how can I keep the password
Hi Kylo,
I've never used this approach since I took the assumption that my facts may
be used outside of/before all of my Puppet manifests were fully installed.
It did, at times, dictate either code duplication or the creation of an
external Ruby Gem that both could use that would be installed via
