- Original Message -
> From: "Corey Osman"
> To: "puppet-dev"
> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 7:47:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] RFC - A specification for module schemas
> On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 10:47:48 PM UTC-8, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message --
On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 9:29:02 AM UTC-8, Gareth Rushgrove wrote:
>
> I think there are some interesting ideas here but I want to pull out
> the problems, and then jot down a few thoughts. Lots of comments
> inline.
>
>
> On 30 January 2016 at 04:45, Corey Osman > wrote:
> > Hi,
>
On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 10:47:48 PM UTC-8, R.I. Pienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Corey Osman" >
> > To: "puppet-dev" >
> > Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 5:45:05 AM
> > Subject: [Puppet-dev] RFC - A specification for module schemas
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
I think there are some interesting ideas here but I want to pull out
the problems, and then jot down a few thoughts. Lots of comments
inline.
On 30 January 2016 at 04:45, Corey Osman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to bring up a conversation in hopes that we as a community can
> create a specification
On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 4:47:13 AM UTC+11, Rob Nelson wrote:
>
>
> While you can't force all the forge modules to be updated, I highly
> suggest setting up rspec-puppet on your controlrepo. You'll find the
> modules that don't support future parser with 3, or 4 in general, and file
>
