On 15/02/11 21:21, Luke Kanies wrote:
> Good catch, and definitely a good idea.
>
> I don't suppose you feel like creating a set of SMF tests for this? :)
I've given it a go, but getting the rspec to work was a steep learning
curve! I'll resend the patches.
--
Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Consulting
Good catch, and definitely a good idea.
I don't suppose you feel like creating a set of SMF tests for this? :)
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> If state is running, using svcadm enable is harmless and prevents errors with
> execute().
>
> Signed-off-by: Dominic Cleal
> ---
>
If state is running, using svcadm enable is harmless and prevents errors with
execute().
Signed-off-by: Dominic Cleal
---
Local-branch: tickets/master/6324
lib/puppet/provider/service/smf.rb |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/puppet/provider/service/s
