On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:29 PM, badgerious wrote:
> Thanks Rob. I guess I'd vote B as well, because, while A may work even
> with some name collisions, it would be I think very confusing to debug if
> there were ever a real conflict. As far as how back I want to support,
> dunno really, I just t
Thanks Rob. I guess I'd vote B as well, because, while A may work even with
some name collisions, it would be I think very confusing to debug if there
were ever a real conflict. As far as how back I want to support, dunno
really, I just thought it would be polite to throw a guard in there since
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, badgerious wrote:
> I'd like to define an FFI feature in a module so it can die gracefully on
> older puppets
>
This seems reasonable, but how far back are you wanting to support? We've
had FFI included since 3.3.2[1].
[1] https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/b
I'd like to define an FFI feature in a module so it can die gracefully on
older puppets, but the question I have is this: Is it better to
A) create a feature at 'puppet/feature/ffi.rb' and do something like:
Puppet.features.add(:ffi, :libs => ['ffi'])
B) create a feature at 'puppet/feature/my_
