On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:15 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien <
aurelien.degrem...@cea.fr> wrote:
> Le 04/12/2014 22:24, Kylo Ginsberg a écrit :
>
> So Charlie, Spencer, Eric0 and I just had a quick convo on #puppet-dev
> about where non-breaking changes to puppet should land, given that the
> transition
Le 04/12/2014 22:24, Kylo Ginsberg a écrit :
So Charlie, Spencer, Eric0 and I just had a quick convo on #puppet-dev
about where non-breaking changes to puppet should land, given that the
transition to puppet 4 will take a while for many sites. The tldr was
the proposal that:
* non-breaking ch
On 12/04/2014 02:24 PM, Kylo Ginsberg wrote:
> ** non-breaking changes go to 3.7.x (and are merged up -> stable -> master)
I suspect random bug fixes will be largely submitted as PRs against the
'stable' ref. That might mean a situation of having to back merge to
3.7.x and forward merge to master
So Charlie, Spencer, Eric0 and I just had a quick convo on #puppet-dev
about where non-breaking changes to puppet should land, given that the
transition to puppet 4 will take a while for many sites. The tldr was the
proposal that:
* non-breaking changes should default to 3.7.x until some time pass
