Re: [Puppet-dev] Perf improvement

2013-12-19 Thread DEGREMONT Aurelien
Le 19/12/2013 17:32, Adrien Thebo a écrit : Your original email is actually under active discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/puppet-dev/P8ReCHvmd2o and in fact was updated 3 hours ago, I think we are trying to

Re: [Puppet-dev] Perf improvement

2013-12-19 Thread Adrien Thebo
Your original email is actually under active discussion at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/puppet-dev/P8ReCHvmd2o and in fact was updated 3 hours ago, I think we are trying to sort out those implications/complications/drawbacks in that thread. Are you able to view that conversation? On Thu

Re: [Puppet-dev] Perf improvement

2013-12-19 Thread DEGREMONT Aurelien
That was why I posted this here, to see if there is some other implications/complications/drawbacks to this change. Aurélien Le 19/12/2013 12:05, Felix Frank a écrit : Well, I guess this is the sort of patch you want to apply to your own boxen for the time being. I believe it may take a whil

Re: [Puppet-dev] Perf improvement

2013-12-19 Thread Felix Frank
Well, I guess this is the sort of patch you want to apply to your own boxen for the time being. I believe it may take a while to reach a consensus about accepting it upstream, because it changes behavior pretty deep inside the very core of puppet, and the possible implications must be weighed care

Re: [Puppet-dev] Perf improvement

2013-12-19 Thread DEGREMONT Aurelien
Nobody cares? This is a performance improvement which seems harmless. Aurélien Le 17/12/2013 16:42, DEGREMONT Aurelien a écrit : Hello Working on upgrading from 0.25 to 3.x, I faced a regression regarding Service ensure behavior. In 0.25, this code, on a RedHat system: service { 'ntpd':