>> We just don't expose the syntax directly; instead of
>>
>> cat(template("a.erb"), template("b.erb")
>>
>>
>> you write:
>>
>> "${template("a.erb")}${template("b.erb")}"
>>
>>
>> and this is internally processed as a concatenation...so what you're
>> suggesting is just a syntax-desugaring.
I c
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Markus Roberts wrote:
>
> We’re also going to introduce a concatenation function called “cat”.
>>
>
> Note there is already a concatenation operator in puppet (from
> lib/puppet/parser/ast/leaf.rb):
>
>
> class Concat < AST::Leaf
> def evaluate(scope)
>
> We’re also going to introduce a concatenation function called “cat”.
>
Note there is already a concatenation operator in puppet (from
lib/puppet/parser/ast/leaf.rb):
class Concat < AST::Leaf
def evaluate(scope)
@value.collect { |x| x.evaluate(scope) }.collect{ |x| x ==
:undef ? ''
We've gone back and forth on this for a while, I'd like us to get an
implementation agreed upon.
If the topic doesn't instantly make sense to you, please visit the bug for
an overview of our current inconsistent behavior:
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5158
Whenever an array is specified
