Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-19 Thread Ken Barber
> The only problem I see with deprecating active_record storeconfigs is: > How are you going to use exported resources in puppet apply > environments, without having to do all the SSL dance? > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/puppet-users/L4CAHh3eYag/To9nHlAvA34J Well, we could simplify the

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-19 Thread Peter Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > - I've had no trouble running PuppetDB *and postgres* alongside a > master in a relatively small VM for testing purposes The only problem I see with deprecating active_record storeconfigs is: How are you going to use exported resources in puppet app

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-16 Thread Luke Kanies
On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:57 PM, Jason Antman wrote: > If this was just a troll, I'll speak the unfortunate truth - please keep that > on the puppet-users list, which is increasingly filling with it. Hi Jason, That's the first I've heard anyone say that puppet-users is filling with trolls. I'd

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-15 Thread Jason Antman
If this was just a troll, I'll speak the unfortunate truth - please keep that on the puppet-users list, which is increasingly filling with it. If this was a legitimate question, I'd guess you have some horrible misconfiguration - ActiveRecord was barely functional at best, and riddled with problem

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-10 Thread Michael Stahnke
Additionally, from a performance perspective, we couldn't even run the test suites we run with PuppetDB against the ActiveRecord based system. It falls over, we run out of memory and the slowness is unreal. If you want to see this in action, Look for "PuppetConf Deepak" on youtube and you'll see ta

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-10 Thread Pete Brown
I have to agree with everyone. I used stored configs for a few years but switched to PuppetDB the day it got released. Stored configs was a good concept and allowed me to do some pretty amazing things at the time and without it a things were so much harder. I do admit I was a bit sceptical about P

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-10 Thread James Turnbull
Eric Shamow wrote: > It’s not just you. > > Further as someone who remains a JVM skeptic (and caveat: former PL > employee), PuppetDB is one of the cleanest/nicest pieces of engineering > I’ve seen PL produce. > > That’s not to say I don’t have issues with bits of it (what software do > I not hav

Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-08 Thread Eric Shamow
It’s not just you. Further as someone who remains a JVM skeptic (and caveat: former PL employee), PuppetDB is one of the cleanest/nicest pieces of engineering I’ve seen PL produce. That’s not to say I don’t have issues with bits of it (what software do I not have issues with?) PuppetDB is some

[Puppet-dev] Re: Lightweight PuppetDB replacement

2014-09-08 Thread Daniele Sluijters
Hi, Maybe it's me but I find the way you started this discussion extremely rude and at some point offensive. You jettison in here with random claims of ugliness and slowness and that acitve_record was a better fit. I don't know what you're trying to achieve but you might want to work on how you