Paul Lathrop p...@tertiusfamily.net writes:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net wrote:
Paul Lathrop p...@tertiusfamily.net writes:
I started seeing these symptoms when my puppetmaster was overloaded
with more clients than Webrick could handle. Are you
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:25 +0100, Peter Meier wrote:
Hi
Are you talking about the fix for the bug #1469?
If yes, it will be in 0.25 only (it would be very difficult to backport
it as it was possible to implement it for 0.25 because Luke did a huge
refactor of the file type).
Good morning,
I am trying to wrap my head around following problem. It would be
wonderful to be able to reuse definitions applying either inheritance
(ideally) or mix-ins but it seems that I have hit a puppet's by
design limitation.
I absolutely understand than Classes are to be used for the
Hi
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. A module has no real
existence of it's own, within puppet; it's just a convenient way of
bundling manifests and files together.
A better way of expressing myself would be to say that I'd like to make
class X depend on class Y.
sounds like
howdy,
I assign specific applications to machines via a class. Each
application has its own log files that need to be managed by our
logging system (splunk, for those who are familiar with it). This
basically entails adding a line to a config file. How do you do
this? ie, manage the config
Keith Edmunds wrote:
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. A module has no real
existence of it's own, within puppet; it's just a convenient way of
bundling manifests and files together.
A better way of expressing myself would be to say that I'd like to make
class X depend on class
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:24:21 +1100, ja...@lovedthanlost.net said:
require = Class[Y]
Works fine for me.
Unless I'm mistaken, I can't apply that statement to a the current class
(to ensure that all of class Y is executed before this class starts). I
have to add that to one of the elements of
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:57:07AM -0700, jb wrote:
howdy,
I assign specific applications to machines via a class. Each
application has its own log files that need to be managed by our
logging system (splunk, for those who are familiar with it).
This basically entails adding a line to
how do you then download *all* the packages installed on the 400 or so
servers from redhat, to seed your local repo ?
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Ohad Levy ohadl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would argue that a one time effort to get proper repo locally, would be
much more efficient than using a
Sam Abed wrote:
how do you then download *all* the packages installed on the 400 or so
servers from redhat, to seed your local repo ?
This OTN article from Oracle on creating a local repository from ULN
could probably be modified fairly easily to be used with RHEL.
Mrepo: http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/mrepo/
Don't forget that, if you're using Red Hat's updates, you still need
to have a license for each system that you're updating.
Trevor
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 21:07, Sam Abed sama...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you then download *all* the packages
11 matches
Mail list logo
