My original email didn't explain my problem very well.
I'm just looking for a bit of advice on how to implement the
following;
How do I force my Service declaration (which is defined elsewhere and
inherited) to run after an exec has run?
ypbind is already defined as a service elsewhere so I
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 02:20 -0700, Mike Lancaster wrote:
My original email didn't explain my problem very well.
I'm just looking for a bit of advice on how to implement the
following;
How do I force my Service declaration (which is defined elsewhere and
inherited) to run after an exec has
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:06 AM, Bryan Kearney wrote:
Bjørn Dyresen wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 10:42 PM, Neil K wrote:
Hi all,
I am pretty new to Puppet. My puppet master server is a RHEL 5 box
and
puppet client is a CentOS 5.3 vm. I have managed to configure puppet
server to
Greetings,
Lets say i have a module, 'centos_base'[1] which kinda bootstraps or
keeps a system to a certain standard. Packages, timezones, yum repos
prios, snmp config, ssh_auth keys, stuff like that.
Now, i would like to make sure that if a node has this module, it should
always be
Hi!
I'm new to puppet and just testing it out.
I'm running SLES11 and puppet 0.24.8 from opensuse repos.
I've created a simple manifest to manage the large number of binary files –
quite a possible scenario for e.g. managing repository of software packages.
I see following messages coming into
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Howdy:
How does Passenger perform compared to Mongrel? For us Passenger looks
worse. We have two puppetmasters; one does file serving, the other does
everything else. We just started running 0.25 beta2 on both. The
file-server
/usr/lib/ruby is a directory, not a symlink.
I wanted to make it easier to install, so I dropped the Factor and
Puppet packages into a Package Installer meta package. For whatever
reason, the meta package is causing the symlink to be replaced with a
directory. I will need to look at how I
Let me answer that...
found in site.pp...filebucket option...
# The filebucket option allows for file backups to the server
filebucket { main: server = 'my.server.name' }
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi all,
Best Practices Question: I've got Nagios configured via puppet, and (of
course) I want to monitor services. Where should I put the @@nagios_service
definitions? (example uses apache2)
a) In the apache2 module (high-coupling)
b) In the nagios module (doesn't make sense)
c) In some
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Eric Gerlach wrote:
Hi all,
Best Practices Question: I've got Nagios configured via puppet, and
(of
course) I want to monitor services. Where should I put the
@@nagios_service
definitions? (example uses apache2)
a) In the apache2 module
Some form of node classification tool -
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/CommonMisconceptions
It is mentioned here but I don't see any references to it in the wiki
anymore.
Did it die before fruition or does it now go by another name?
Dave M.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Mark Plaksinha...@usg.edu wrote:
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Howdy:
How does Passenger perform compared to Mongrel? For us Passenger looks
worse. We have two puppetmasters; one does file serving, the other does
everything
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have a
run at least this many puppetmasters setting. We set the max to 12 to
match mongrel but we never saw more than 6 masters running. We bumped
max to 24 late yesterday and I now see 11 masters running.
I just found the check box in Package Maker to follow symlinks. You
have to double click on each package to get at that preference. I
don't understand why it's not in the Configuration screen.
At any rate, my meta installer is now working. Thanks for the help.
BTW, I've started using Deep
On Jun 26, 7:48 pm, Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net wrote:
Why are you using Puppet to perform a job that your OS can perform much
much easier with its bundled software?
I think you got me wrong – I'm not going to manage software packages
via Puppet, I was just going to sync a large number of
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Allan Marcusal...@lanl.gov wrote:
I just found the check box in Package Maker to follow symlinks. You
have to double click on each package to get at that preference. I
don't understand why it's not in the Configuration screen.
At any rate, my meta installer
Kirill Kuvaldin wrote:
On Jun 26, 7:48 pm, Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net wrote:
Why are you using Puppet to perform a job that your OS can perform much
much easier with its bundled software?
I think you got me wrong – I'm not going to manage software packages
via Puppet, I was just
No, probably not. I was just being lazy and didn't want to push out
two packages.
Given that Facter and Puppet are different code branches that are not
dependent on each other (true?), then having seperate packages seems
fine.
BTW, are you going to post a new Facter package with the
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Allan Marcusal...@lanl.gov wrote:
No, probably not. I was just being lazy and didn't want to push out
two packages.
Given that Facter and Puppet are different code branches that are not
dependent on each other (true?), then having seperate packages seems
hello,
from what I understand, certs are assigned based on FQDN. We build all
our machines behind a NAT router and then when fully ready, we add the
machine to the main network, or might be used on a daily basis behind
a different NAT router - it all depends on the security requirements
yep, I knew that. But we pay Google a lot of money to keep the
distribution page updated!
Oh wait, we forgot to send the check. It's in the mail! Yep, check's
in the mail. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :-)
---
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
505-667-5666
On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:03 AM,
2009/6/26 Allan Marcus al...@lanl.gov:
hello,
from what I understand, certs are assigned based on FQDN. We build all
our machines behind a NAT router and then when fully ready, we add the
machine to the main network, or might be used on a daily basis behind
a different NAT router - it all
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
All of our puppetmasters are running on the same size hardware. The
machines have 8 cores and 12G of RAM.
Do you expect Passenger to perform better?
Not necessarily. But load average isn't exactly a great performance
metric. BTW, what's the load
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Allan Marcusal...@lanl.gov wrote:
yep, I knew that. But we pay Google a lot of money to keep the
distribution page updated!
Oh wait, we forgot to send the check. It's in the mail! Yep, check's
in the mail. That's my story and I'm stickin' to it. :-)
check
On Jun 26, 3:05 pm, Mark Plaksin ha...@usg.edu wrote:
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Are you running the same # of mongrels as Passenger workers?
Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have a
run at least this many puppetmasters setting.
Christian Hofstaedtler ch+...@zeha.at writes:
On Jun 26, 3:05 pm, Mark Plaksin ha...@usg.edu wrote:
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Are you running the same # of mongrels as Passenger workers?
Sort of :) We run 12 masters in mongrel. Passenger doesn't seem have
Wrong place to do this, you do not use puppet to create a package. you
sue puppet to install the package. The distribution you are using will
dictate how to create packages. The ./configure, make, make install
plus anything else needed for your particular package format would be
done by you
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
0.25b1 and 0.25b2).
Were the puppetmasters verifiably slower? If so, how did you measure it?
-scott
--
sc...@ohlol.net
done by you to create the application package. The package would then
be setup in a local repository and now puppet uses the appropraite
package manager to install you custom package.
what distribution are you using?
Evan
My puppet master server is RHEL 5 and puppet client is CentOS
On Jun 26, 9:56 pm, Mark Plaksin ha...@usg.edu wrote:
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both with
0.25b1 and 0.25b2).
Were the
Christian Hofstaedtler ch+...@zeha.at writes:
On Jun 26, 9:56 pm, Mark Plaksin ha...@usg.edu wrote:
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Mark Plaksin wrote:
Load average is peaking around 10. That's not so good compared to
running under mongrel where the load peaked at less than 5 (both
hello,
maybe i missed it, but is the autosign.conf file documented anywhere?
If want to autosign all the computers in my domain, can I just put
*.lanl.gov
in the autosign.conf file?
---
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
505-667-5666
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allan Marcus wrote:
hello,
maybe i missed it, but is the autosign.conf file documented anywhere?
If want to autosign all the computers in my domain, can I just put
*.lanl.gov
Allan
See:
Hello guys,
I am facing this problem. I have an exec resource which has a create
parameter. The catalog runs properly but the file is not created, has anyone
faced such a problem?
My manifest is
class example
{
exec { sources:
command = /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/gem sources -a
Swati Tiwari wrote:
The command runs fine but it does not create /tmp/githubadded file.
I think you're misunderstanding the parameter. The exec resource does
not create this file. It assumes whatever it is exec'ing will create the
file. So, it will keep running the exec until this file is
Swati Tiwari writes:
Hello guys,
I am facing this problem. I have an exec resource which has a create
parameter. The catalog runs properly but the file is not created, has anyone
faced such a problem?
My manifest is
class example
{
exec { sources:
Swati Tiwari wrote:
The command runs fine but it does not create /tmp/githubadded file. I
also have write permission on this directory. Any help would be
appreciated. Thanks!
creates
A file that this command creates. If this parameter is provided, then
the command will only be run if
Got it! Thank you!
I did this and it worked!
exec { sources:
command = sudo gem sources -a http://gems.github.com/
/tmp/githubadded,
creates = /tmp/githubadded
}
I hope that's the right way to do it...
2009/6/26 Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net
Swati Tiwari wrote:
The command
Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net writes:
Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
What worries me is, that you are saying it takes twice as long and
your load is twice as high. So you're actually seeing a 4-time worse
performance, which is /very/ bad.
Which processes do you see running? puppetmasterds and
Thanks for all the pointers!
Currently I build all the files with a derivation of the
Apt_Repository recipe (http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/
Recipes/Apt_Repositories). So I would need to write these files to a
temp dir on the client and run concat on them.
Is there a way to
Nigel, if you have similar scripts for flat or dmg pkgs I would love
to take a look. Does puppet's support such packages? Did you have any
trouble reconciling the different receipt mechanisms in 10.4/10.5?
On Jun 26, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
Please note that for both Puppet
41 matches
Mail list logo
