You might need a comma after 'obscured_because_security' :)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Sean McKinley
wrote:
> We recently upgraded to PE2015, and as such have upgraded our local puppet
> gems to match (4.2.2). Unfortunately a few of our specs that were
> previously passing are now failing,
We recently upgraded to PE2015, and as such have upgraded our local puppet
gems to match (4.2.2). Unfortunately a few of our specs that were
previously passing are now failing, mostly in regards to stages:
"Evaluation Error: Error while evaluating a Function Call, Could not find
stage first spe
On 2015-24-09 7:13, Malintha Adikari wrote:
Hi Corey,
Thank you very much for your answer. May be this is what I am looking
for. I have few doubts about the way using this solution.
hiera('nodes', 'default_value', 'nodes/host1234')
*'nodes/host1234' - *Is this a yaml file name ? I know the yam
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Kenton Brede wrote:
> I'm wondering the same thing here.
>
> Sorry, missed this thread the first time.
> Kent
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ellison Marks wrote:
>
>> So, I'm going through the dance of upgrading to puppet 4.2 from 3.8 on
>> CentOS 6, and
Dear Puppet Enterprise Users,
Puppet Enterprise 2015.2.1 is now available.
Puppet Enterprise 2015.2.1 is a bug-fix and security release of Puppet
Enterprise. All users of Puppet Enterprise are encouraged to upgrade when
possible to Puppet Enterprise 2015.2.1.
For information on the fixes in this
Hi,
I am looking for a puppet agent rpm that can run against a puppet 4
server (and can use its features) for RHEL 7 on ppc 64. On
yum.puppetlabs.com, I can only find binaries for agent 1.2.4 (latest
version) for x86_64 and i386, and the corresponding SRPM directories
do only have puppetdb and pup
So per my previous post, I'm now trying to replace the file POSIX
permissions with ACLs. I'm apparently missing something though. I want to
replicate what I had before in the new supported method, i.e.:
owner => 'SYSTEM',
group => 'Administrators',
mode=> '0775',
Hi,
On 24/09/2015 04:39, Michael Stahnke wrote:
> Short answer, yes there are plans, but we haven't scheduled the work yet.
Ok. Cool.
> We know it's painful right now, and I'm sorry for that. I'll see we can get
> that slotted in soon.
Absolutely no problem. I just wanted to know what it expec