[Puppet Users] undefined method each for #String:

2013-07-11 Thread Greg Chavez
that is causing this? Thanks. -- \*..+.- --Greg Chavez +//..;}; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

[Puppet Users] Re: undefined method each for #String:

2013-07-11 Thread Greg Chavez
Removing ruby1.9.1 fixed the problem. On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Greg Chavez greg.cha...@gmail.com wrote: I run puppet 3.2.2 on about 500 RedHat 5/6 systems. I have about 15 Ubuntu servers that run OpenStack; today I added the stdlib module to take advantage of the file_line type

Re: [Puppet Users] ruby issue

2013-06-15 Thread Greg Chavez
will be solved in total when my company transitions to CentOS later this year. Cheers. --Greg Chavez On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Stuart Cracraft smcracr...@me.com wrote: Boo!!! Hiss!! Be a One-Stop-Shop! It's YOUR collective after all --Stuart On Jun 14, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Michael

Re: [Puppet Users] ruby issue

2013-06-12 Thread Greg Chavez
wrote: We supply rubygems for rhel 5 because it is not available in centos or rhel 5 core (it is in EPEL). In rhel6 and cent6, it is widely and easily available (in cent6 base, and in rhel6 optional repos), so we don't supply it for el6. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Greg Chavez greg.cha

Re: [Puppet Users] ruby issue

2013-06-11 Thread Greg Chavez
dropped from the puppetlabs rhel 6 repo? Thanks --Greg Chavez On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Stuart Cracraft smcracr...@me.com wrote: You are most welcome. On Jun 10, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Lab Yizhar lab.yiz...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks m8 for the mental support :) As you already know, as an open

[Puppet Users] Seriously, am I the only one having trouble with the RHEL puppetlabs repos?

2013-01-29 Thread Greg Chavez
users community. I'd be so happy. -- \*..+.- --Greg Chavez +//..;}; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [Puppet Users] Seriously, am I the only one having trouble with the RHEL puppetlabs repos?

2013-01-29 Thread Greg Chavez
I've run yum clean all a hundred times, but that's besides the point since I only notice the problem on new systems. The build system (Cobbler) installs the latest puppet-release rpm for each node, then instantiates Puppet. It's worked like butter for over a year. -- You received this message

Re: [Puppet Users] Seriously, am I the only one having trouble with the RHEL puppetlabs repos?

2013-01-29 Thread Greg Chavez
. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Greg Chavez greg.cha...@gmail.com wrote: This is the third time I've sent a message about this. Does anybody know what's going on? I'm going to file a bug if this isn't fixed soon. RHEL6: http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6/products/x86_64

[Puppet Users] REDUX: puppetlabs-products yum checksum failing

2013-01-24 Thread Greg Chavez
Again with the yum metadata checksum failures: http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/6/products/x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum I'm thinking it's time for me to add the Puppetlabs repos to my mrepo box. -- \*..+.- --Greg Chavez +//..;}; -- You

Re: [Puppet Users] puppetlabs-products yum checksum failing

2013-01-18 Thread Greg Chavez
systems today. Should I report this as a bug? -- \*..+.- --Greg Chavez +//..;}; -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group

[Puppet Users] puppetlabs-products yum checksum failing

2013-01-17 Thread Greg Chavez
puppetlabs-depsPuppet Labs Dependencies El 5 - x86_64 45 puppetlabs-productsPuppet Labs Products El 5 - x86_64 0 Same on RHEL6. Insidious problem. Only noticed it because I was kicking some systems today. Should I report this as a bug? -- \*..+.- --Greg Chavez