Did you ever find a resolution to this?
On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 at 5:52:27 AM UTC-5, Sans wrote:
>
>
> Figured out that the using CNAME is not really the issue but I'm still
> getting the same error 3 out of 5 or so. If anyone know anything related to
> this, can you please help? Cheers!!
>
>
I like the idea. Personally I've always wished to just see facts in the
form of:
pre_puppet => post_puppet
You now have a record of what it was before going into puppet as well as a
record when it comes out. Thats about the best accuracy one can hope for.
--
You received this message becaus
>
> Which guy? The OP?
Yep, OP, per the rest of the post.
That's not what anyone else in this necro'd thread said back in its
> previous life, so exactly what and who are you agreeing with?
Yes, it was actually this necro'd threads main point of emphasis, including
subject, introduction, mid
