Was this resolved? I'm using 2.6.4 and still can't declare packages
with the same package name:
package { legacy_chunk:
name => 'facter',
provider => 'rpm',
ensure => absent,
}
package { gem_chunk:
name => 'facter',
provider => 'gem',
ensure => latest
}
Thank you.
--
You received this me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>> I have tried this solution as well and it did not work. I may resort
>>> to an exec as Patrick suggested.
>>
>> it will work when we have composite primary keys for resources, I'm not
>> sure we will get that in 2.6, but there are definately plans
On 7/8/2010 4:09 AM, Peter Meier wrote:
On 07/07/2010 07:10 PM, hernan wrote:
I have tried this solution as well and it did not work. I may resort
to an exec as Patrick suggested.
it will work when we have composite primary keys for resources, I'm not
sure we will get that in 2.6, but there a
Peter Meier wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 07:10 PM, hernan wrote:
>> I have tried this solution as well and it did not work. I may resort
>> to an exec as Patrick suggested.
>
> it will work when we have composite primary keys for resources, I'm not
> sure we will get that in 2.6, but there are definate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 07:10 PM, hernan wrote:
> I have tried this solution as well and it did not work. I may resort
> to an exec as Patrick suggested.
it will work when we have composite primary keys for resources, I'm not
sure we will get that in 2.6, but
I have tried this solution as well and it did not work. I may resort
to an exec as Patrick suggested.
thnx..
Hernan
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Gustavo Soares wrote:
> I don't think that it should work.
> I have a similar a problem when I want to manage to gems with different
> versions.. I
I don't think that it should work.
I have a similar a problem when I want to manage to gems with different
versions.. I have tried something like this:
package { "memcached-0.18.0":
name => "memcached",
provider => gem,
ensure => "0.18.0"
}
package { "memcached-0.20.0":
name => "me
* hernan [2010/06/30 17:02]:
> I'm building a puppet manifest for an Ubuntu machine that needs to
> have both of these on it:
>
> package { "memcached":
> provider => gem,
> ensure => "0.18.0"
> }
>
> package { "memcached":
> provider => apt,
> ensure => installed
> }
I
On Jun 30, 2010, at 5:02 PM, hernan wrote:
> I'm building a puppet manifest for an Ubuntu machine that needs to
> have both of these on it:
>
> package { "memcached":
>provider => gem,
>ensure => "0.18.0"
> }
>
> package { "memcached":
>provider => apt,
>ensure => installed
>
I'm building a puppet manifest for an Ubuntu machine that needs to
have both of these on it:
package { "memcached":
provider => gem,
ensure => "0.18.0"
}
package { "memcached":
provider => apt,
ensure => installed
}
This fails with the following error:
err: Could not ret
10 matches
Mail list logo
