On 09/17/2012 07:18 PM, Nan Liu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jakov Sosic jso...@srce.hr wrote:
On 09/16/2012 04:47 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
or the interface property could accept a hash. I have not tried it
myself but it should work because the puppetlabs f5 type seems to use
it:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Jakov Sosic jso...@srce.hr wrote:
On 09/16/2012 04:47 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
or the interface property could accept a hash. I have not tried it
myself but it should work because the puppetlabs f5 type seems to use
it:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 06:37:28PM +0200, Jakov Sosic wrote:
Hi.
I've successfully written and tested three puppet custom types for
managing cobbler so far (distro, repo and profile). So far it has been
interesting week, learning ruby from zero, learning custom types etc.
But I'm really
On 09/16/2012 04:47 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
As you pointed out you can write different types and the system types
will create the system with no interfaces at all (if that is possible)
and the interface type will add them later on.
It's possible to add interfaces later, I just have to check
On 09/16/2012 04:47 PM, Stefan Schulte wrote:
or the interface property could accept a hash. I have not tried it
myself but it should work because the puppetlabs f5 type seems to use
it:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-f5#appendix
Also, if you don't mind to explain it, or to show by
Hi.
I've successfully written and tested three puppet custom types for
managing cobbler so far (distro, repo and profile). So far it has been
interesting week, learning ruby from zero, learning custom types etc.
But I'm really satisfied with the results so far.
Now I'm trying to figure out how
