I found a thread from March on puppet-dev (Subject Line: End of Life estimate
for Puppet 3.X?)
On which Eric Sorenson said, referring to Open Source Puppet, "As a practical
matter we're going to have Puppet 3.8 on maintenance and security fixes as long as
there's a supported PE version that in
Dan,
That might be a better question for Red Hat as they often support
bundled/associated EOL
products (like ruby 1.8.7) by themselves once the vendor support ends.
On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, Dan White wrote:
> I found a thread from March on puppet-dev (Subject Line: End of Life
> estima
Good idea, but I thought I'd ask in both camps.
Thanks.
Dan White | d_e_wh...@icloud.com
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the
universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” (Bill Waterson: Calvin
This shows the Satellite lifecycle:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/satellite
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsub
Dan,
Disclaimer: I work for Red Hat, not on Satellite, and not in a customer
facing role: jpryor [AT] redhat.com
Red Hat is not customizing puppet 3.8 in Satellite 6 in any way. Puppet
3.8.x as part of of Satellite 6.2 is supported by Red Hat. It has been
publicly stated in presentations at Red Ha
It does, but it does not make any mention of the almost-obsolete Puppet inside
Satellite
Dan White | d_e_wh...@icloud.com
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the
universe is that none of it has tried to con
THAT is the definitive kind of answer I was hoping for.
Many thanks, James.
Dan White | d_e_wh...@icloud.com
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the
universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” (
