Hi Matthaus,
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:25:02 PM UTC-7, Matthaus Litteken wrote:
>
> The builds of puppet require ruby, but are built with ruby 1.8 (at
> least on EL 5 and 6, and Fedora 15 and 16), so
> they put all of puppet's lib in the sitelibdir of the ruby they were
> built with, so they
Hi Jeff,
On Monday, October 1, 2012 4:14:05 PM UTC-7, Jeff McCune wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jos Backus >
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any chance we will see Ruby 1.9-compatible RPMs for Puppet 3.0.0 and
> Facter
> > 2.0.0 soon?
>
> Jos,
>
> We're currently building and maintai
The builds of puppet require ruby, but are built with ruby 1.8 (at
least on EL 5 and 6, and Fedora 15 and 16), so
they put all of puppet's lib in the sitelibdir of the ruby they were
built with, so they go in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8 . For EL, we
support whatever ruby distros have available and
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jos Backus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any chance we will see Ruby 1.9-compatible RPMs for Puppet 3.0.0 and Facter
> 2.0.0 soon?
Jos,
We're currently building and maintaining our own ruby 1.8.7 packages
and the Puppet and Facter RPM's depend on these. What Ruby 1.9
packages
