[Puppet Users] Re: Inheritance syntax question

2008-10-13 Thread Luke Kanies
On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:56 PM, dd-b wrote: On Oct 8, 3:31 am, Peter Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Foo::bar[default] { [...] The only way I can get this syntax to work is to move the 'bar' definition outside of the foo class and refer to it by a name without '::' in it in foo2. Is

[Puppet Users] Re: Inheritance syntax question

2008-10-09 Thread Peter Meier
Hi Foo::bar[default] { [...] The only way I can get this syntax to work is to move the 'bar' definition outside of the foo class and refer to it by a name without '::' in it in foo2. Is there a way to override a definition with '::' in its name? it's Foo::Bar[default] { Let me just

[Puppet Users] Re: Inheritance syntax question

2008-10-08 Thread Peter Meier
Hi Foo::bar[default] { [...] The only way I can get this syntax to work is to move the 'bar' definition outside of the foo class and refer to it by a name without '::' in it in foo2. Is there a way to override a definition with '::' in its name? it's Foo::Bar[default] { greets pete

[Puppet Users] Re: Inheritance syntax question

2008-10-08 Thread steve caldwell
On Oct 8, 1:31 am, Peter Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's Foo::Bar[default] { That worked perfectly, thanks Pete! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send