On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 4:35:02 PM UTC-5, Lesley Kimmel wrote:
>
> I've [somewhat] recently started developing Puppet modules for use with
> Foreman[...]
>
I recently came across some modules on the Forge that got me considering
> using modules with defined types exposing their functional
I've [somewhat] recently started developing Puppet modules for use with
Foreman and have gone through a couple iterations. At first I was
developing a large, broadly-scoped module for a specific purpose. I soon
found that in order to provide any amount of customizable behavior I would
have to p
- Original Message -
> On Aug 23, 1:00 pm, Digant C Kasundra wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, how are people using parameterized classes in a
> > way that is distinct from defined-types?
>
> I am _using_ defined types, that's how.
>
> Although I disfavor parameterized classes and do not us
On 8/24/11 3:46 PM, jcbollinger wrote:
If you have an OO background then the words "class" and "type" may
have connotations and implied similarity for you that just don't apply
in Puppet. Puppet classes are not "types" in the type theory sense.
Defined types are closer to that, but it may help t
On Aug 23, 1:00 pm, Digant C Kasundra wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how are people using parameterized classes in a way that is
> distinct from defined-types?
I am _using_ defined types, that's how.
Although I disfavor parameterized classes and do not use them, the
pattern of my usage of defined
