[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-03-04 Thread Luke Kanies
On Mar 4, 2009, at 4:44 AM, mattimust...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Mar 4, 3:56 am, Luke Kanies wrote: >> >> Not to nit-pick, but it's more that I just couldn't write in the >> language. I did try pretty hard, and have since successfully written >> a bit in it (in Jython, actually), but I just

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-03-04 Thread mattimust...@gmail.com
On Mar 4, 3:56 am, Luke Kanies wrote: > > Not to nit-pick, but it's more that I just couldn't write in the   > language.  I did try pretty hard, and have since successfully written   > a bit in it (in Jython, actually), but I just could never turn my   > ideas into code in Python.  And no, it w

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-03-03 Thread Rob Chanter
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 4:30 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > > Agreed. That'd be a useful feature and if we'd probably do it like > Nagios plug-ins do - doesn't matter what the language is as long as they > output data that the Facter API can parse into facts - Perl, Python, C, > Rexx (*coughs*), et

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-03-03 Thread Luke Kanies
On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:30 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Nigel Kersten wrote: >> >> 3. ++ to what everyone else said. >> >> There has been discussion around a future version of Facter allowing >> for facts to be provided by executables in a certa

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-03-03 Thread Luke Kanies
On Feb 27, 2009, at 9:15 PM, go8ose wrote: > >> >> I'd be interested in a python version of puppet. >> >> Don't get me wrong it's a great tool it's just that I like python a >> lot more than ruby and hence (of course) do most of my scripting in >> python which leads to more python knowledge which

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-28 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 GWD wrote: > Was hoping for something like ((for discussion purposes)MOD_PyPUPPET) > module to call Puppet from Python and write Facter Recipes from Pyhon. > > Though I strongly favor Python, Puppet should make easier for other to > write their recip

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-28 Thread youbiquity
Good point.. James put it best: "That'd be a useful feature and if we'd probably do it like Nagios plug-ins do - doesn't matter what the language is as long as they output data that the Facter API can parse into fact" Ed --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this mess

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-28 Thread Evan Hisey
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:27 AM, GWD wrote: > > Was hoping for something like ((for discussion purposes)MOD_PyPUPPET) > module to call Puppet from Python and write Facter Recipes from Pyhon. > > Though I strongly favor Python, Puppet should make easier for other to > write their recipes in PHP, J

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-28 Thread GWD
Was hoping for something like ((for discussion purposes)MOD_PyPUPPET) module to call Puppet from Python and write Facter Recipes from Pyhon. Though I strongly favor Python, Puppet should make easier for other to write their recipes in PHP, JavaScript, even Haskell The point being that Puppet

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-27 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nigel Kersten wrote: > > 3. ++ to what everyone else said. > > There has been discussion around a future version of Facter allowing > for facts to be provided by executables in a certain directory, which > is about as far as I can see Python integra

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-27 Thread Nigel Kersten
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:15 PM, go8ose wrote: > >> >> I'd be interested in a python version of puppet. >> >> Don't get me wrong it's a great tool it's just that I like python a >> lot more than ruby and hence (of course) do most of my scripting in >> python which leads to more python knowledge w

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-27 Thread go8ose
> > I'd be interested in a python version of puppet. > > Don't get me wrong it's a great tool it's just that I like python a > lot more than ruby and hence (of course) do most of my scripting in > python which leads to more python knowledge which leads (for me) to > easier expansion if it would be

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-24 Thread Martin Marcher
Hi, On Feb 23, 11:56 pm, gluegl wrote: > Is there a Puppet Python version? > If so where can the latest version be downloaded? > Thanks in advance, > -E I'd be interested in a python version of puppet. Don't get me wrong it's a great tool it's just that I like python a lot more than ruby and h

[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Python release?

2009-02-23 Thread James Turnbull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gluegl wrote: > Is there a Puppet Python version? > If so where can the latest version be downloaded? > Thanks in advance, Not sure what you are asking. Are you asking if Puppet supports managing python? Or if there is a version of Puppet written i