Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-17 Thread James Turnbull
Todd Zullinger wrote: > Forrie wrote: >> What is the disadvantage of using the puppet gem vs. installing from >> source (install.rb)? > > Well, I wouldn't recommend that either. I much prefer a proper > packaging system like dpkg or rpm. But that's just my opinion. :) > +1. Regards James Tur

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-17 Thread Todd Zullinger
Forrie wrote: > What is the disadvantage of using the puppet gem vs. installing from > source (install.rb)? Well, I wouldn't recommend that either. I much prefer a proper packaging system like dpkg or rpm. But that's just my opinion. :) -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.po

[Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-16 Thread Forrie
What is the disadvantage of using the puppet gem vs. installing from source (install.rb)? On Jun 15, 5:33 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote: [ .. ] > I'd highly recommend not using gems. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to thi

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-16 Thread James Turnbull
Forrie wrote: > I can't find the ticket link. http://projects.puppetlabs.com/ > > FWIW: These are the files installed for the server component: > > ./etc/puppet > ./etc/puppet/fileserver.conf > ./etc/puppet/manifests > ./etc/puppet/puppetca.conf > ./etc/puppet/puppetd.conf > ./etc/puppet/puppe

[Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-16 Thread Forrie
I can't find the ticket link. FWIW: These are the files installed for the server component: ./etc/puppet ./etc/puppet/fileserver.conf ./etc/puppet/manifests ./etc/puppet/puppetca.conf ./etc/puppet/puppetd.conf ./etc/puppet/puppetmasterd.conf ./etc/rc.d/init.d/puppetmaster ./etc/sysconfig/puppetm

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-16 Thread James Turnbull
Forrie wrote: > I guess I'm just a little surprised that install.rb doesn't have an > option to modify the installation, like ./install.rb --client ... > The major difference between the client and server packages on most OSes is the binaries they install - they still install all of the Puppet

[Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-16 Thread Forrie
I guess I'm just a little surprised that install.rb doesn't have an option to modify the installation, like ./install.rb --client ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroup

[Puppet Users] Re: Separate install for just client code?

2010-06-15 Thread Forrie
Really. I think the *.gem is convenient. However, the args to install.rb (puppet) don't seem to indicate one or the other (server/ client): Usage: install.rb [options] --[no-]rdoc Prevents the creation of RDoc output. Default on.