On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 05:39:05AM -0800, tomcat wrote:
>
> Hi, Gang..
>
> The Subject: line says it all. My organisation is looking at
> selecting a configuration management system. Any comments about
> why you chose Puppet over other options would be very helpful to
> us.
Because after helpin
My reasoning is pretty simplistic. Because Luke is a businessman who
built Puppet with what I believe is the goal of turning it into a
sustainable business that solves problems for businesses. All of the
other alternatives were built by academics as reasons to write papers
that would get t
I swear by Puppet. It's the right tool for the task, designed from the
ground up to do what it does best. That plus it is super-flexible, readable,
extensible, and has a dope community.
That's my un-professional, not-so-well written $.02.
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Larry Ludwig wrote:
On Jan 27, 9:47 am, Evan Hisey wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jonathan Share wrote:
>
> > 2009/1/27 tomcat :
>
> >> Hi, Gang..
>
> >> The Subject: line says it all. My organisation is looking at
> >> selecting a configuration management
> >> system. Any comments about why you chose
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jonathan Share wrote:
>
> 2009/1/27 tomcat :
>>
>> Hi, Gang..
>>
>> The Subject: line says it all. My organisation is looking at
>> selecting a configuration management
>> system. Any comments about why you chose Puppet over other options
>> would be very helpful
2009/1/27 tomcat :
>
> Hi, Gang..
>
> The Subject: line says it all. My organisation is looking at
> selecting a configuration management
> system. Any comments about why you chose Puppet over other options
> would be very helpful to us.
>
My reason was just readability, I was comparing puppet w
